Literature DB >> 22561973

Adrenal cortical responses to high-intensity, short rest, resistance exercise in men and women.

Tunde K Szivak1, David R Hooper, Courtenay Dunn-Lewis, Brett A Comstock, Brian R Kupchak, Jenna M Apicella, Catherine Saenz, Carl M Maresh, Craig R Denegar, William J Kraemer.   

Abstract

Commercial high-intensity, short rest (HI/SR) protocols have been anecdotally postured to be extremely demanding. However, limited prior studies have demonstrated HI/SR protocols to produce hyperreactions in metabolic and adrenal function; thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the physiological effects of an acute, high-intensity (75% 1-repetition maximum), short rest resistance exercise protocol. Nine trained men (age: 23.5 ± 3.5 years, height: 172.4 ± 4.0 cm, weight: 77.8 ± 8.8 kg) and 9 trained women (age: 22.9 ± 2.0 years, height: 168.4 ± 9.4 cm, weight: 68.5 ± 10.4 kg) participated in the HI/SR protocol, which consisted of a descending pyramid scheme of back squat, bench press, and deadlift, beginning with 10 repetitions of each, then 9, then 8, and so on until 1 repetition on the final set. Significant time effects were observed in lactate (immediate post [IP], +15, +60) and cortisol (IP, +15, +60) response. Significant sex effects were observed in lactate response (IP, +15) but not in cortisol response. Total work was higher in men and influenced magnitude of increase in lactate but not cortisol. No significant sex differences were noted in time to completion, average relative intensity, heart rate response or rating of perceived exertion scores. Highest lactate (IP men: 17.3 mmol·L(-1); IP women: 13.8 mmol·L(-1)) and cortisol (+15 men: 1,860.2 nmol·L(-1); +15 women: 1,831.7 nmol·L(-1)) values were considerably greater than those produced in typical resistance exercise programs, confirming that relative intensity and rest period length are important factors determining magnitude of metabolic and adrenal stress. Practical applications for the coach include cautious implementation of HI/SR protocols, as long-term sequential use may promote overtraining. A gradual reduction in rest interval length with concurrent gradual increase in intensity should be used to minimize potential negative effects such as nonfunctional overreaching.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22561973     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318259e009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  8 in total

1.  A single bout of resistance exercise can enhance episodic memory performance.

Authors:  Lisa Weinberg; Anita Hasni; Minoru Shinohara; Audrey Duarte
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2014-09-28

2.  CrossFit® Training Strategies from the Perspective of Concurrent Training: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Petr Schlegel
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 3.  Resistance Training and Stroke: A Critical Analysis of Different Training Programs.

Authors:  Bruno Bavaresco Gambassi; Hélio José Coelho-Junior; Paulo Adriano Schwingel; Fabiano de Jesus Furtado Almeida; Tânia Maria Gaspar Novais; Paula de Lourdes Lauande Oliveira; Bismarck Ascar Sauaia; Cristiane Dominice Melo; Marco Carlos Uchida; Bruno Rodrigues
Journal:  Stroke Res Treat       Date:  2017-12-20

4.  p38 MAPK activation and H3K4 trimethylation is decreased by lactate in vitro and high intensity resistance training in human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Lena Willkomm; Sebastian Gehlert; Daniel Jacko; Thorsten Schiffer; Wilhelm Bloch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Are extreme conditioning programmes effective and safe? A narrative review of high-intensity functional training methods research paradigms and findings.

Authors:  Ramires Alsamir Tibana; Nuno Manuel Frade de Sousa
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2018-11-02

6.  Acute leucocyte, muscle damage, and stress marker responses to high-intensity functional training.

Authors:  João Henrique Gomes; Renata Rebello Mendes; Crystianne Santana Franca; Marzo Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto; Danilo Rodrigues Pereira da Silva; Angelo Roberto Antoniolli; Ana Mara de Oliveira E Silva; Lucindo José Quintans-Júnior
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Two Consecutive Days of Crossfit Training Affects Pro and Anti-inflammatory Cytokines and Osteoprotegerin without Impairments in Muscle Power.

Authors:  Ramires A Tibana; Leonardo M de Almeida; Nuno M Frade de Sousa; Dahan da Cunha Nascimento; Ivo V de Sousa Neto; Jeeser A de Almeida; Vinicius C de Souza; Maria de Fátima T P L Lopes; Otávio de Tolêdo Nobrega; Denis C L Vieira; James W Navalta; Jonato Prestes
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Acute and Chronic Catabolic Responses to CrossFit® and Resistance Training in Young Males.

Authors:  Emanuela Faelli; Ambra Bisio; Roberto Codella; Vittoria Ferrando; Luisa Perasso; Marco Panascì; Daniele Saverino; Piero Ruggeri
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.