Literature DB >> 22561485

Differential effects of m1 and m2 receptor antagonists in perirhinal cortex on visual recognition memory in monkeys.

Wei Wu1, Richard C Saunders, Mortimer Mishkin, Janita Turchi.   

Abstract

Microinfusions of the nonselective muscarinic antagonist scopolamine into perirhinal cortex impairs performance on visual recognition tasks, indicating that muscarinic receptors in this region play a pivotal role in recognition memory. To assess the mnemonic effects of selective blockade in perirhinal cortex of muscarinic receptor subtypes, we locally infused either the m1-selective antagonist pirenzepine or the m2-selective antagonist methoctramine in animals performing one-trial visual recognition, and compared these scores with those following infusions of equivalent volumes of saline. Compared to these control infusions, injections of pirenzepine, but not of methoctramine, significantly impaired recognition accuracy. Further, similar doses of scopolamine and pirenzepine yielded similar deficits, suggesting that the deficits obtained earlier with scopolamine were due mainly, if not exclusively, to blockade of m1 receptors. The present findings indicate that m1 and m2 receptors have functionally dissociable roles, and that the formation of new visual memories is critically dependent on the cholinergic activation of m1 receptors located on perirhinal cells. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22561485      PMCID: PMC3389587          DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2012.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  53 in total

1.  Mapping visual recognition memory through expression of the immediate early gene c-fos.

Authors:  X O Zhu; B J McCabe; J P Aggleton; M W Brown
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-07-29       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Effects of selective muscarinic antagonists, pirenzepine and AF-DX 116, on passive avoidance tasks in mice.

Authors:  T Ohnuki; Y Nomura
Journal:  Biol Pharm Bull       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.233

Review 3.  Molecular biology of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  J Wess
Journal:  Crit Rev Neurobiol       Date:  1996

4.  Effects of muscarinic blockade in perirhinal cortex during visual recognition.

Authors:  Y Tang; M Mishkin; T G Aigner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor expression in memory circuits: implications for treatment of Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  A I Levey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Control of M-current.

Authors:  N V Marrion
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 19.318

7.  Transient impairment of cholinergic function in the rat insular cortex disrupts the encoding of taste in conditioned taste aversion.

Authors:  C Naor; Y Dudai
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Neuronal activity related to visual recognition memory: long-term memory and the encoding of recency and familiarity information in the primate anterior and medial inferior temporal and rhinal cortex.

Authors:  F L Fahy; I P Riches; M W Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Effects of the novelty or familiarity of visual stimuli on the expression of the immediate early gene c-fos in rat brain.

Authors:  X O Zhu; M W Brown; B J McCabe; J P Aggleton
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Blockade of hippocampal M1 muscarinic receptors impairs working memory performance of rats.

Authors:  M Ohno; T Yamamoto; S Watanabe
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1994-07-11       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  5 in total

1.  Blockade of glutamatergic transmission in perirhinal cortex impairs object recognition memory in macaques.

Authors:  Ludise Malkova; Patrick A Forcelli; Laurie L Wellman; David Dybdal; Mark F Dubach; Karen Gale
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Memory loss in a nonnavigational spatial task after hippocampal inactivation in monkeys.

Authors:  Patrick A Forcelli; Guillermo Palchik; Taylor Leath; Jacqueline T DesJardin; Karen Gale; Ludise Malkova
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Antiamnesic and Neuroprotective Effects of an Aqueous Extract of Ziziphus jujuba Mill. (Rhamnaceae) on Scopolamine-Induced Cognitive Impairments in Rats.

Authors:  Etienne Djeuzong; Antoine K Kandeda; Séfirin Djiogue; Lewale Stéphanie; Danide Nguedia; Florence Ngueguim; Jean P Djientcheu; Jonas Kouamouo; Théophile Dimo
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 2.629

4.  Benchmarking ligand-based virtual High-Throughput Screening with the PubChem database.

Authors:  Mariusz Butkiewicz; Edward W Lowe; Ralf Mueller; Jeffrey L Mendenhall; Pedro L Teixeira; C David Weaver; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Intrahippocampal blockade of nicotinic or muscarinic receptors fails to impair nonnavigational spatial memory in macaques.

Authors:  Elyssa M LaFlamme; Ludise Malkova; Patrick A Forcelli
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.154

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.