BACKGROUND: During the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic, household transmission studies were implemented to better understand the characteristics of the transmission of the novel virus in a confined setting. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess and summarize the findings of these studies. We identified 27 articles, around half of which reported studies conducted in May and June 2009. RESULTS: In 13 of the 27 studies (48%) that collected respiratory specimens from household contacts, point estimates of the risk of secondary infection ranged from 3% to 38%, with substantial heterogeneity. Meta-regression analyses revealed that a part of the heterogeneity reflected varying case ascertainment and study designs. The estimates of symptomatic secondary infection risk, based on 20 studies identifying febrile acute respiratory illness among household contacts, also showed substantial variability, with point estimates ranging from 4% to 37%. CONCLUSIONS: Transmission of the 2009 pandemic virus in households appeared to vary among countries and settings, with differences in estimates of the secondary infection risk also partly due to differences in study designs.
BACKGROUND: During the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic, household transmission studies were implemented to better understand the characteristics of the transmission of the novel virus in a confined setting. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess and summarize the findings of these studies. We identified 27 articles, around half of which reported studies conducted in May and June 2009. RESULTS: In 13 of the 27 studies (48%) that collected respiratory specimens from household contacts, point estimates of the risk of secondary infection ranged from 3% to 38%, with substantial heterogeneity. Meta-regression analyses revealed that a part of the heterogeneity reflected varying case ascertainment and study designs. The estimates of symptomatic secondary infection risk, based on 20 studies identifying febrile acute respiratory illness among household contacts, also showed substantial variability, with point estimates ranging from 4% to 37%. CONCLUSIONS: Transmission of the 2009 pandemic virus in households appeared to vary among countries and settings, with differences in estimates of the secondary infection risk also partly due to differences in study designs.
Authors: Simon Cauchemez; Achuyt Bhattarai; Tiffany L Marchbanks; Ryan P Fagan; Stephen Ostroff; Neil M Ferguson; David Swerdlow Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-01-31 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: L Calatayud; S Kurkela; P E Neave; A Brock; S Perkins; M Zuckerman; M Sudhanva; A Bermingham; J Ellis; R Pebody; M Catchpole; R Heathcock; H Maguire Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2009-11-20 Impact factor: 2.451
Authors: Yang Yang; Jonathan D Sugimoto; M Elizabeth Halloran; Nicole E Basta; Dennis L Chao; Laura Matrajt; Gail Potter; Eben Kenah; Ira M Longini Journal: Science Date: 2009-09-10 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Edward Goldstein; Benjamin J Cowling; Justin J O'Hagan; Leon Danon; Vicky J Fang; Angela Hagy; Joel C Miller; David Reshef; James Robins; Paul Biedrzycki; Marc Lipsitch Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2010-07-20 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Jessica Y Wong; Heath Kelly; Dennis K M Ip; Joseph T Wu; Gabriel M Leung; Benjamin J Cowling Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Cuiling Xu; Kwok-Hung Chan; Tim K Tsang; Vicky J Fang; Rita O P Fung; Dennis K M Ip; Simon Cauchemez; Gabriel M Leung; J S Malik Peiris; Benjamin J Cowling Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2015-09-22 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Benjamin J Cowling; Dennis K M Ip; Vicky J Fang; Piyarat Suntarattiwong; Sonja J Olsen; Jens Levy; Timothy M Uyeki; Gabriel M Leung; J S Malik Peiris; Tawee Chotpitayasunondh; Hiroshi Nishiura; James Mark Simmerman Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2013 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Aharona Glatman-Freedman; Ian Portelli; Susan K Jacobs; Justin I Mathew; Jonathan E Slutzman; Lewis R Goldfrank; Silas W Smith Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-11-30 Impact factor: 3.240