Literature DB >> 22561074

Anatomical practice at Göttingen University since the Age of Enlightenment and the fate of victims from Wolfenbüttel prison under Nazi rule.

Susanne Ude-Koeller1, Wilfried Knauer, Christoph Viebahn.   

Abstract

This report briefly summarises anatomical practice at Göttingen University from its founding in 1737 until the Nazi period and gives a detailed account of how Nazi death penalty legislation and execution practice at Wolfenbüttel prison influenced the decision-making of the anatomists in charge at that time. Problems in the procurement of corpses, encountered almost continuously throughout Europe since the broad introduction of dissection into medical training in the early 18th century, were absent in Göttingen during periods of overt progress in anatomical sciences, e.g. under Albrecht von Haller (in office 1736-1753) and Jacob Henle (1853-1885), and at times when existing regulations were rigorously enforced by the authorities (1814-1851). Ample availability of corpses in the wake of more than 600 executions in Wolfenbüttel between 1935 and 1945 was curtailed only by transportation fuel shortages and resulted in the dissection of more than 200 Nazi victim corpses in the Göttingen anatomy course. Apparently, neither individual offers of voluntary body donation (dating from 1932 to 1937 and published here as the earliest documents of this kind), nor the strong tradition of high-level anatomical research, nor even the awareness of the University's Age of Enlightenment origin, prevented the unethical use of corpses of Nazi victims for medical teaching. The Göttingen example may add "historical and moral detachment" under unusual political and wartime pressures to the "clinical and emotional detachment" thought to prevail amongst anatomy personnel (Hildebrandt, in this issue); together with the other reports it calls for all anatomists to bear in mind their ever present ethical obligations in respect to activities involving the use of corpses, both in medical schools and in the public domain.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22561074     DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2012.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Anat        ISSN: 0940-9602            Impact factor:   2.698


  4 in total

1.  Tradition or change? Sources of body procurement for the Anatomical Institute of the University of Cologne in the Third Reich.

Authors:  Stephanie Kaiser
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  [Double standards : The Medical Student Kurt Gerstein and the History of Anatomical Body Procurement in Germany].

Authors:  Mathias Schütz
Journal:  NTM       Date:  2018-06

3.  Victor Frankenstein's Institutional Review Board Proposal, 1790.

Authors:  Gary Harrison; William L Gannon
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  [Modelled Development. Practices of Human Embryology at Göttingen University in the Second Half of the Twentieth Century].

Authors:  Michael Markert
Journal:  NTM       Date:  2020-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.