Literature DB >> 22560979

Transfemoral aortic valve replacement with the Edwards SAPIEN and Edwards SAPIEN XT prosthesis using exclusively local anesthesia and fluoroscopic guidance: feasibility and 30-day outcomes.

Eric Durand1, Bogdan Borz1, Matthieu Godin1, Christophe Tron1, Pierre-Yves Litzler2, Jean-Paul Bessou2, Karim Bejar1, Chiara Fraccaro1, Carlos Sanchez-Giron1, Jean-Nicolas Dacher3, Fabrice Bauer1, Alain Cribier1, Hélène Eltchaninoff4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The authors report the feasibility and 30-day outcomes of transfemoral aortic valve replacement (TAVR), using the Edwards SAPIEN (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) and Edwards SAPIEN XT (Edwards Lifesciences) prosthesis, implanted using exclusively local anesthesia and fluoroscopic guidance.
BACKGROUND: Transfemoral TAVR is often managed with general anesthesia. However, a simplified percutaneous approach using local anesthesia has become more popular because it offers multiple advantages in an elderly and fragile population.
METHODS: Between May 2006 and January 2011, the authors prospectively evaluated 151 consecutive patients (logistic EuroSCORE: 22.8 ± 11.8%) who underwent TAVR (SAPIEN: n = 78, SAPIEN XT: n = 73) using only local anesthesia and fluoroscopic guidance. The primary endpoint was a combination of all-cause mortality, major stroke, life-threatening bleeding, stage 3 acute kidney injury (AKI), periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI), major vascular complication, and repeat procedure for valve-related dysfunction at 30 days.
RESULTS: Transarterial femoral approach was surgical in all SAPIEN procedures and percutaneous in 97.3% of SAPIEN XT, using the ProStar vascular closure device, and was well tolerated in all cases. Conversion to general anesthesia was required in 3.3% (SAPIEN cases) and was related to complications. Vasopressors were required in 5.5%. Procedural success was 95.4%. The combined-safety endpoint was reached in 15.9%, including overall mortality (6.6%), major stroke (2.0%), life-threatening bleeding (7.9%), stage 3 AKI (0.7%), periprocedural MI (1.3%), major vascular complication (7.9%), and repeat procedure for valve-related dysfunction (2.0%) at 30 days. A permanent pacemaker was required in 5.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: This single-center, prospective registry demonstrated the feasibility and safety of a simplified transfemoral TAVR performed using only local anesthesia and fluoroscopic guidance in high surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22560979     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  26 in total

1.  Safe implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Molly Szerlip; Deborah Tabachnick; Mohanad Hamandi; LuAnn Caras; Allison T Lanfear; John J Squiers; Katherine Harrington; Srinivasa P Potluri; J Michael DiMaio; Jordan Wooley; Benjamin Pollock; Justin M Schaffer; William T Brinkman; David L Brown; Michael J Mack
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2020-09-23

2.  Risk factors and outcome of postoperative delirium after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Peter Stachon; Klaus Kaier; Andreas Zirlik; Jochen Reinöhl; Timo Heidt; Wolfgang Bothe; Philip Hehn; Manfred Zehender; Christoph Bode; Constantin von Zur Mühlen
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 3.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an update.

Authors:  Sharif A Halim; Todd L Kiefer; G Chad Hughes; Lynne M Hurwitz; J Kevin Harrison
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Sedation and Anesthesia in Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Catheterization: A Prospective Multicenter Experience.

Authors:  C Huie Lin; Sanyukta Desai; Ramzi Nicolas; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Susan Foerster; Anshuman Sharma; Laurie Armsby; Audrey C Marshall; Kirsten Odegard; James DiNardo; Julie Vincent; Howaida El-Said; James Spaeth; Bryan Goldstein; Ralf Holzer; Jackie Kreutzer; David Balzer; Lisa Bergersen
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  A prospective, non-randomized comparison of SAPIEN XT and CoreValve implantation in two sequential cohorts of patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Albert Markus Kasel; Salvatore Cassese; Thomas Ischinger; Alexander Leber; Diethmar Antoni; Gotthard Riess; Jayshree Vogel; Adnan Kastrati; Walter Eichinger; Ellen Hoffmann
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2014-06-28

6.  Valvular Disease: Role of cardiac surgery support during contemporary TAVI.

Authors:  Torsten P Vahl; Susheel K Kodali
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 32.419

7.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Without General Anaesthetic.

Authors:  Simon Kennon; Zhan Lim
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2014-04

Review 8.  The transition from transesophageal to transthoracic echocardiography during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an evolving field.

Authors:  Menhel Kinno; Eric P Cantey; Vera H Rigolin
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2018-11-21

Review 9.  Arterial access and arteriotomy site closure devices.

Authors:  Sunil V Rao; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Total percutaneous femoral vessels cannulation for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Matteo Pozzi; Roland Henaine; Daniel Grinberg; Jacques Robin; Christine Saroul; Bertrand Delannoy; Olivier Desebbe; Jean-François Obadia
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.