Literature DB >> 22560799

Why performance-based contracting failed in Uganda--an "open-box" evaluation of a complex health system intervention.

Freddie Ssengooba1, Barbara McPake, Natasha Palmer.   

Abstract

Performance-based contracting (PBC) is a tool that links rewards to attainment of measurable performance targets. Significant problems remain in the methods used to evaluate this tool. The primary focus of evaluations on the effects of PBC (black-box) and less attention to how these effects arise (open-box) generates suboptimal policy learning. A black-box impact evaluation of PBC pilot by the Development Research Group of the World Bank (DRG) and the Ministry of Health (MOH) concluded that PBC was ineffective. This paper reports a theory-based case study intended to clarify how and why PBC failed to achieve its objectives. To explain the observed PBC implementation and responses of participants, this case study employed two related theories i.e. complex adaptive system and expectancy theory respectively. A prospective study trailed the implementation of PBC (2003-2006) while collecting experiences of participants at district and hospital levels. Significant problems were encountered in the implementation of PBC that reflected its inadequate design. As problems were encountered, hasty adaptations resulted in a de facto intervention distinct from the one implied at the design stage. For example, inadequate time was allowed for the selection of service targets by the health centres yet they got 'locked-in' to these poor choices. The learning curve and workload among performance auditors weakened the validity of audit results. Above all, financial shortfalls led to delays, short-cuts and uncertainty about the size and payment of bonuses. The lesson for those intending to implement similar interventions is that PBC should not be attempted 'on the cheap'. It requires a plan to boost local institutional and technical capacities of implementers. It also requires careful consideration of the responses of multiple actors - both insiders and outsiders to the intended change process. Given the costs and complexity of PBC implementation, strengthening conventional approaches that are better attuned to low income contexts (financing resource inputs and systems management) remains a viable policy option towards improving health service delivery.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22560799     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  44 in total

1.  Local stakeholders' perceptions about the introduction of performance-based financing in Benin: a case study in two health districts.

Authors:  Elisabeth Paul; Nadine Sossouhounto; Dieudonné Sèdjro Eclou
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2014-09-26

Review 2.  Local sustainability and scaling up for user fee exemptions: medical NGOs vis-à-vis health systems.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Olivier de Sardan; Aïssa Diarra; Félix Yaouaga Koné; Maurice Yaogo; Roger Zerbo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Fitting Health Financing Reforms to Context: Examining the Evolution of Results-Based Financing Models and the Slow National Scale-Up in Uganda (2003-2015).

Authors:  Aloysius Ssennyonjo; Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho; Timothy Musila; Freddie Ssengooba
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.640

4.  Political economy analysis of the performance-based financing programme in Afghanistan.

Authors:  Ahmad Shah Salehi; Karl Blanchet; Anna Vassall; Josephine Borghi
Journal:  Glob Health Res Policy       Date:  2021-03-10

5.  Performance-based financing as a health system reform: mapping the key dimensions for monitoring and evaluation.

Authors:  Sophie Witter; Jurrien Toonen; Bruno Meessen; Jean Kagubare; György Fritsche; Kelsey Vaughan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Design of an impact evaluation using a mixed methods model--an explanatory assessment of the effects of results-based financing mechanisms on maternal healthcare services in Malawi.

Authors:  Stephan Brenner; Adamson S Muula; Paul Jacob Robyn; Till Bärnighausen; Malabika Sarker; Don P Mathanga; Thomas Bossert; Manuela De Allegri
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Protocol for the evaluation of a pay for performance programme in Pwani region in Tanzania: a controlled before and after study.

Authors:  Josephine Borghi; Iddy Mayumana; Irene Mashasi; Peter Binyaruka; Edith Patouillard; Ikunda Njau; Ottar Maestad; Salim Abdulla; Masuma Mamdani
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  People-centred science: strengthening the practice of health policy and systems research.

Authors:  Kabir Sheikh; Asha George; Lucy Gilson
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2014-04-17

9.  Protocol for the process evaluation of interventions combining performance-based financing with health equity in Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Valéry Ridde; Anne-Marie Turcotte-Tremblay; Aurélia Souares; Julia Lohmann; David Zombré; Jean Louis Koulidiati; Maurice Yaogo; Hervé Hien; Matthew Hunt; Sylvie Zongo; Manuela De Allegri
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Understanding the dynamic interactions driving Zambian health centre performance: a case-based health systems analysis.

Authors:  Stephanie M Topp; Julien M Chipukuma; Johanna Hanefeld
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.