OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to investigate the association between religious coping and mental health in a socioeconomically disadvantaged population. METHODS: Participants were selected as they presented for mental healthcare at a community health center for patients with little, if any, financial resources or insurance. A total of 123 patients participated in this study. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify religious coping predictors for mental health outcomes. RESULTS: Positive religious coping (PRC) was significantly associated with and predictive of better mental health (P < .01). Conversely, negative religious coping (NRC) was found to be significantly associated with poorer mental health scores (P = .031) with gender, income, and ethnicity controlled for in the model. The relationship between NRC and inferior mental health outcomes was more robust than the relationship between PRC and improved mental health scores. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates the important association between PRC and NRC and mental health outcomes among economically disadvantaged patients. Interpretation of these findings and clinical implications are offered.
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to investigate the association between religious coping and mental health in a socioeconomically disadvantaged population. METHODS:Participants were selected as they presented for mental healthcare at a community health center for patients with little, if any, financial resources or insurance. A total of 123 patients participated in this study. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify religious coping predictors for mental health outcomes. RESULTS: Positive religious coping (PRC) was significantly associated with and predictive of better mental health (P < .01). Conversely, negative religious coping (NRC) was found to be significantly associated with poorer mental health scores (P = .031) with gender, income, and ethnicity controlled for in the model. The relationship between NRC and inferior mental health outcomes was more robust than the relationship between PRC and improved mental health scores. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates the important association between PRC and NRC and mental health outcomes among economically disadvantaged patients. Interpretation of these findings and clinical implications are offered.
Authors: Hamid Sharif Nia; Saeed Pahlevan Sharif; Amir Hossein Goudarzian; Kelly A Allen; Saman Jamali; Mohammad Ali Heydari Gorji Journal: J Relig Health Date: 2017-12
Authors: Jonathan M Lassiter; Lena Saleh; Christian Grov; Tyrel Starks; Ana Ventuneac; Jeffrey T Parsons Journal: Psycholog Relig Spiritual Date: 2017-11-27
Authors: Kathrin Maier; Karol Konaszewski; Sebastian Binyamin Skalski; Arndt Büssing; Janusz Surzykiewicz Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-14 Impact factor: 3.390