PURPOSE: 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) is already an integral part of staging in rhabdomyosarcoma. We investigated whether primary-site treatment response characterized by serial PET imaging at specific time points can be correlated with local control. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined 94 patients with rhabdomyosarcoma who received initial chemotherapy 15 weeks (median) before radiotherapy and underwent baseline, preradiation, and postradiation PET. Baseline PET standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and the presence or absence of abnormal uptake (termed PET-positive or PET-negative) both before and after radiation were examined for the primary site. Local relapse-free survival (LRFS) was calculated according to baseline SUVmax, PET-positive status, and PET-negative status by the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparisons were tested with the log-rank test. RESULTS: The median patient age was 11 years. With 3-year median follow-up, LRFS was improved among postradiation PET-negative vs PET-positive patients: 94% vs 75%, P=.02. By contrast, on baseline PET, LRFS was not significantly different for primary-site SUVmax≤7 vs >7 (median), although the findings suggested a trend toward improved LRFS: 96% for SUVmax≤7 vs 79% for SUVmax>7, P=.08. Preradiation PET also suggested a statistically insignificant trend toward improved LRFS for PET-negative (97%) vs PET-positive (81%) patients (P=.06). CONCLUSION: Negative postradiation PET predicted improved LRFS. Notably, 77% of patients with persistent postradiation uptake did not experience local failure, suggesting that these patients could be closely followed up rather than immediately referred for intervention. Negative baseline and preradiation PET findings suggested statistically insignificant trends toward improved LRFS. Additional study may further understanding of relationships between PET findings at these time points and outcome in rhabdomyosarcoma.
PURPOSE:18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) is already an integral part of staging in rhabdomyosarcoma. We investigated whether primary-site treatment response characterized by serial PET imaging at specific time points can be correlated with local control. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined 94 patients with rhabdomyosarcoma who received initial chemotherapy 15 weeks (median) before radiotherapy and underwent baseline, preradiation, and postradiation PET. Baseline PET standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and the presence or absence of abnormal uptake (termed PET-positive or PET-negative) both before and after radiation were examined for the primary site. Local relapse-free survival (LRFS) was calculated according to baseline SUVmax, PET-positive status, and PET-negative status by the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparisons were tested with the log-rank test. RESULTS: The median patient age was 11 years. With 3-year median follow-up, LRFS was improved among postradiation PET-negative vs PET-positive patients: 94% vs 75%, P=.02. By contrast, on baseline PET, LRFS was not significantly different for primary-site SUVmax≤7 vs >7 (median), although the findings suggested a trend toward improved LRFS: 96% for SUVmax≤7 vs 79% for SUVmax>7, P=.08. Preradiation PET also suggested a statistically insignificant trend toward improved LRFS for PET-negative (97%) vs PET-positive (81%) patients (P=.06). CONCLUSION: Negative postradiation PET predicted improved LRFS. Notably, 77% of patients with persistent postradiation uptake did not experience local failure, suggesting that these patients could be closely followed up rather than immediately referred for intervention. Negative baseline and preradiation PET findings suggested statistically insignificant trends toward improved LRFS. Additional study may further understanding of relationships between PET findings at these time points and outcome in rhabdomyosarcoma.
Authors: Dana L Casey; Leonard H Wexler; Paul A Meyers; Heather Magnan; Alexander J Chou; Suzanne L Wolden Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2014-10-24 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Matthew M Ladra; Henry C Mandeville; Andrzej Niemierko; Timothy P Padera; Alison M Friedmann; Shannon M MacDonald; David Ebb; Yen-Lin Chen; Nancy J Tarbell; Torunn I Yock Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2015-04-08 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Abby R Rosenberg; James R Anderson; Elizabeth Lyden; David A Rodeberg; Suzanne L Wolden; Simon C Kao; David M Parham; Carola Arndt; Douglas S Hawkins Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Gill Norman; Debra Fayter; Kate Lewis-Light; Julia Chisholm; Kieran McHugh; Daniel Levine; Meriel Jenney; Henry Mandeville; Suzanne Gatz; Bob Phillips Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-01-08 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Douglas J Harrison; Yueh-Yun Chi; Jing Tian; Pooja Hingorani; Leo Mascarenhas; Geoffrey B McCowage; Brenda J Weigel; Rajkumar Venkatramani; Suzanne L Wolden; Torunn I Yock; David A Rodeberg; Andrea A Hayes-Jordan; Lisa A Teot; Sheri L Spunt; William H Meyer; Douglas S Hawkins; Barry L Shulkin; Marguerite T Parisi Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2020-12-19 Impact factor: 4.452