Literature DB >> 22560414

A comparison of techniques: informed consent for resident involvement in cataract surgery.

Rajeshvar K Sharda1, Jeffrey H Sher, Brian J Chan, Lawrence E Kobetz, Keith D Mann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare three different techniques of obtaining informed patient consent and the relative acceptance rates for resident involvement in cataract surgery. The techniques differed with regards to physician-patient interaction, and how resident involvement was presented.
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study in a tertiary care ophthalmology department with a recently established residency training program. PARTICIPANTS: 356 patients undergoing informed consent procedure for cataract surgery.
METHODS: Charts of all patients undergoing cataract surgery by 3 cataract surgeons from October 2009 to March 2010 were reviewed. Patient demographics, the documentation of a specific request for resident participation, and the patient response were recorded. Response rates were analyzed between the three different techniques/surgeons.
RESULTS: Consent to resident participation was found to range from 21% to 86%. Higher acceptance rates were associated with direct personal conversation between surgeon and patient.
CONCLUSION: High acceptance rates for resident involvement in cataract surgery can be achieved with full disclosure of resident involvement to patients.
Copyright © 2012 Canadian Ophthalmological Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22560414     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2012.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0008-4182            Impact factor:   1.882


  1 in total

1.  Patients' perspectives on the extent of resident participation in the operating room for total hip oxr knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jessica Bryce; Silvio Ndoja; Prateek Goyal; Brent Lanting; James Howard
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2021-02-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.