Literature DB >> 22560096

Noninvasive limb remote ischemic preconditioning contributes neuroprotective effects via activation of adenosine A1 receptor and redox status after transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats.

Sheng Hu1, Hailong Dong, Haopeng Zhang, Shiquan Wang, Lichao Hou, Shaoyang Chen, Jinsong Zhang, Lize Xiong.   

Abstract

PURPOSES: To investigate whether activation of adenosine A1 receptor (A1R) through limb remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) by a noninvasive tourniquet contribute neuroprotective effects against rat focal cerebral ischemic injury induced by transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO).
METHODS: One hundred twenty-eight Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were randomly assigned into eight groups (n=16 each): MCAO, Control, 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropulxanthine (DPCPX, Adenosine A1 receptor antagonist), RIPC, DPCPX+RIPC, Vehicle+RIPC, 2-chloro-N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA, Adenosine A1 receptor agonist) and CCPA+DPCPX groups. All animals underwent right middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) for 2 h. Limb RIPC consisted of three cycles of 5-minute ischemia followed by 5-minute reperfusion in right hind-limb by tourniquet application. Neurological deficit scores were evaluated 24 h after reperfusion, and then the infarct volume was assessed with diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and 2, 3, 5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining. Inflammation was assessed by serum tumor necrosis factor α (TNF(α)) and NO; oxidative stress was estimated by malondialdehyde (MDA) and 4-hydroxyalkenals (4-HAD), superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity and GSH.
RESULTS: Animals in the RIPC, Vehicle+RIPC and CCPA groups developed lower neurological deficit scores and smaller brain infarct volumes than the Control group (P<0.01). Animals in the DPCPX, DPCPX+RIPC and CCPA+DPCPX groups developed higher neurological deficit scores and larger brain infarct volumes than the RIPC, Vehicle+RIPC and CCPA groups (P<0.01). DPCPX abolished the protective effects of RIPC and CCPA. RIPC or CCPA induced a significant increase in brain MnSOD (manganese SOD) activity and NO generation, and this activity was abolished by DPCPX pretreatment. RIPC or CCPA induced a significant reduction (P<0.05) in the GSH and MDA+4HDA concentration and an accumulation in the GSSG concentration in both compartments (serum and tissue) as compared with the MCAO group.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that limb RIPC induced by noninvasive tourniquet reduces cerebral ischemic injury in rats, and the effect of neuroprotection may depend on the activation of adenosine A1 receptors. CCPA pretreatment can induce delayed ischemic tolerance against cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury. These protective effects are associated with a reduction in oxidative stress, inflammation and endogenous antioxidant preservation.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22560096     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  42 in total

Review 1.  Preconditioning provides neuroprotection in models of CNS disease: paradigms and clinical significance.

Authors:  R Anne Stetler; Rehana K Leak; Yu Gan; Peiying Li; Feng Zhang; Xiaoming Hu; Zheng Jing; Jun Chen; Michael J Zigmond; Yanqin Gao
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 2.  Stroke Caused by Atherosclerosis of the Major Intracranial Arteries.

Authors:  Chirantan Banerjee; Marc I Chimowitz
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 17.367

3.  Protective Effects of Paeoniflorin Against MPP(+)-induced Neurotoxicity in PC12 Cells.

Authors:  Meizhu Zheng; Chunming Liu; Yajun Fan; Dongfang Shi; Yuchi Zhang
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.996

4.  Remote Limb Ischemic Preconditioning: A Neuroprotective Technique in Rodents.

Authors:  Alice Brandli
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 5.  The CD39-adenosinergic axis in the pathogenesis of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Veena Roberts; Bo Lu; Siddharth Rajakumar; Peter J Cowan; Karen M Dwyer
Journal:  Purinergic Signal       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.765

6.  Remote Limb Ischemic Preconditioning Protects Rats Against Cerebral Ischemia via HIF-1α/AMPK/HSP70 Pathway.

Authors:  Ming Xia; Qian Ding; Zhidan Zhang; Qinggen Feng
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.046

7.  Transferred inter-cell ischemic preconditioning-induced neuroprotection may be mediated by adenosine A1 receptors.

Authors:  Jungyeon Yun; Jun Li; Zhiyi Zuo
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 8.  Ischemic Preconditioning in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Maranatha Ayodele; Sebastian Koch
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  The Feinberg Award Lecture 2013: treatment of intracranial atherosclerosis: learning from the past and planning for the future.

Authors:  Marc I Chimowitz
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  The role of erythropoietin in remote renal preconditioning on hippocampus ischemia/reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Mehdi Khaksari; Fatemeh Zare Mehrjerdi; Mohammad Ebrahim Rezvani; Fatemeh Safari; Aghdas Mirgalili; Somayeh Niknazar
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.