OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of lumbar spine individual radiographic features (IRFs) of disc space narrowing (DSN), osteophytes (OST), and facet joint osteoarthritis (FOA); to describe the frequencies of demographic, clinical, and radiographic knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis (OA) across lumbar spine IRFs; and to determine factors associated with lumbar spine IRFs. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 840 participants enrolled in the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project (2003-2004). Sample-based prevalence estimates were generated for each lumbar spine IRF. The associations between lumbar spine IRFs and demographic, clinical, and peripheral joint OA were determined with logistic regression models. RESULTS: Sample-based prevalence estimates were similar for DSN (57.6%) and FOA (57.9%) but higher for OST (88.1%), with significant differences across race and sex. Hand and knee OA frequencies increased across IRFs, whereas the effect was absent for hip OA. African Americans had lower odds of FOA (adjusted odds ratio [OR(adj) ] 0.45 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.32-0.62]), while there was no racial association with DSN and OST. Low back symptoms were associated with DSN (OR(adj) 1.37 [95% CI 1.04-1.80]) but not OST or FOA. Knee OA was associated with OST (OR(adj) 1.62 [95% CI 1.16-2.27]) and FOA (OR(adj) 1.69 [95% CI 1.15-2.49]) but not DSN. Hand OA was associated with FOA (OR(adj) 1.67 [95% CI 1.20-2.28]) but not with DSN or OST. No associations were found with hip OA. CONCLUSION: These findings underscore the importance of analyzing lumbar spine IRFs separately as the associations with demographic, clinical, and radiographic knee, hip, and hand OA differ widely.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of lumbar spine individual radiographic features (IRFs) of disc space narrowing (DSN), osteophytes (OST), and facet joint osteoarthritis (FOA); to describe the frequencies of demographic, clinical, and radiographic knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis (OA) across lumbar spine IRFs; and to determine factors associated with lumbar spine IRFs. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 840 participants enrolled in the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project (2003-2004). Sample-based prevalence estimates were generated for each lumbar spine IRF. The associations between lumbar spine IRFs and demographic, clinical, and peripheral joint OA were determined with logistic regression models. RESULTS: Sample-based prevalence estimates were similar for DSN (57.6%) and FOA (57.9%) but higher for OST (88.1%), with significant differences across race and sex. Hand and knee OA frequencies increased across IRFs, whereas the effect was absent for hip OA. African Americans had lower odds of FOA (adjusted odds ratio [OR(adj) ] 0.45 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.32-0.62]), while there was no racial association with DSN and OST. Low back symptoms were associated with DSN (OR(adj) 1.37 [95% CI 1.04-1.80]) but not OST or FOA. Knee OA was associated with OST (OR(adj) 1.62 [95% CI 1.16-2.27]) and FOA (OR(adj) 1.69 [95% CI 1.15-2.49]) but not DSN. Hand OA was associated with FOA (OR(adj) 1.67 [95% CI 1.20-2.28]) but not with DSN or OST. No associations were found with hip OA. CONCLUSION: These findings underscore the importance of analyzing lumbar spine IRFs separately as the associations with demographic, clinical, and radiographic knee, hip, and hand OA differ widely.
Authors: T W O'Neill; E V McCloskey; J A Kanis; A K Bhalla; J Reeve; D M Reid; C Todd; A D Woolf; A J Silman Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Youssef Masharawi; Bruce Rothschild; Gali Dar; Smadar Peleg; Dror Robinson; Ella Been; Israel Hershkovitz Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2004-08-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: B Miller; R T Campbell; S Furner; J E Kaufman; M Li; N Muramatsu; T Prohaska Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 1997-11 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Amanda E Nelson; Robert F DeVellis; Jordan B Renner; Todd A Schwartz; Philip G Conaghan; Virginia B Kraus; Joanne M Jordan Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2011-10-25 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: A P Goode; S W Marshall; V B Kraus; J B Renner; T Stürmer; T S Carey; D E Irwin; J M Jordan Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2012-08-10 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Mohamed Jarraya; Ali Guermazi; Amanda L Lorbergs; Elana Brochin; Douglas P Kiel; Mary L Bouxsein; L Adrienne Cupples; Elizabeth J Samelson Journal: Spine J Date: 2018-04-19 Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: Gabriele Armbrecht; Dieter Felsenberg; Melanie Ganswindt; Mark Lunt; Stephen K Kaptoge; Klaus Abendroth; Antonio Aroso Dias; Ashok K Bhalla; Jorge Cannata Andia; Jan Dequeker; Richard Eastell; Krzysztof Hoszowski; George Lyritis; Pavol Masaryk; Joyce van Meurs; Tomasz Miazgowski; Ranuccio Nuti; Gyula Poór; Inga Redlund-Johnell; David M Reid; Helmut Schatz; Christopher J Todd; Anthony D Woolf; Fernando Rivadeneira; Muhammad K Javaid; Cyrus Cooper; Alan J Silman; Terence W O'Neill; Jonathan Reeve Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Adam P Goode; Todd A Schwartz; Virginia B Kraus; Janet L Huebner; Steven Z George; Rebecca J Cleveland; Richard Gracely; Maria Jimenez; Louis E DeFrate; Jun Chen; Yvonne M Golightly; Joanne M Jordan Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2019-12-04 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Adam P Goode; Rebecca J Cleveland; Steven Z George; Todd A Schwartz; Virginia B Kraus; Jordan B Renner; Richard H Gracely; Louis E DeFrate; David Hu; Joanne M Jordan; Yvonne M Golightly Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 5.178