Literature DB >> 22553710

Aerocyst urethral catheter insertion compared to expansion sponges application in external dacryocystorhinostomy.

Yi Shao1, Yao Yu, Chong-Gang Pei, Qiong Zhou, Wen-Jia Dong, Yangluowa Qu, Lu Yang, Gui-Ping Gao.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the clinical effect and complications of two different filling materials (aerocyst urethral catheter and expansion sponges) applying in external dacryocystorhinostomy (EXT-DCR) and compare their advantages and disadvantages.
METHODS: A retrospective study was made in the period from April, 1 2000 to April, 1 2005. Totally 180 patients (240 eyes) underwent the EX-DCR using different filling materials and divided into three groups randomly: negative control groups (group 1), expansion sponges group (group 2) and aerocyst urethral catheter group (group 3). The gender, etiology, clinical findings, surgical technique, filling materials, the condition of ocular surface and complications were analyzed. Filling materials were removed during day 7. Postoperative success was determined by lacrimal patency to irrigation, a positive dye test, hemorrhage and errhysis conditions after extubation and subjective resolution of epiphora and liquor puris.
RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 5.14±1.69 years, the success rate were 73.7% (group 1), 86.5% (group 2), 98.7% (group 3) in three groups. There was significant statistical difference among three groups in the surgical success rate and the operative complications (including hemorrhage, errhysis, periorbital ecchymosis after extubation)(P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: EXT-DCR with aerocyst urethral cathete intraoperatively have higher success rate, fewer operative complications and a high patient satisfaction ,and can be used to simplify and speed up traditional EXT-DCR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aerocyst urethral catheter; dacryocystorhinostomy; filling material

Year:  2011        PMID: 22553710      PMCID: PMC3340728          DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2011.05.08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  7 in total

Review 1.  Dacryocystorhinostomy. Diagnosis and treatment of nasolacrimal canal obstructions.

Authors:  M Onerci
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.681

2.  Four-year experience with intranasal transilluminating dacryocystorhinostomy using ultrasound.

Authors:  Emmanuel Pelegrinis; Antonis Morphopoulos; George Georgoulopoulos; Kostas Kapogiannis; Spyros Papaspyrou
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.882

3.  Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy simplified.

Authors:  N Bartal; J Bahyr; V Kizhner
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.597

4.  Lacrimal canaliculoscopy: development of the instrument.

Authors:  M E Ashenhurst; J J Hurwitz
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.882

5.  Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with a T-type ventilation tube.

Authors:  A Faruk Kiroglu; Hakan Cankaya; Köksal Yuca; Muzaffer Kiriş
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-06

6.  Endoscopic revision of external dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Ricardo Demarco; Alex Strose; Marcos Araújo; Fabiana Cardoso Pereira Valera; Iracema Moribe; Wilma Terezinha Anselmo-Lima
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Clinical results of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy using a microdebrider.

Authors:  Sung Wook Yoon; Young Sun Yoon; Su Hyung Lee
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.