AIM: To correlate cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression profile with clinical and pathological variables to assess their prognostic/predictive value in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). METHODS: Archival tumor samples were analyzed using immunohistochemistry for COX-2 expression in 94 patients with CRC. Patients were diagnosed and treated at the Departments of Surgery and Oncology, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Saudi Arabia. RESULTS: Fifty-six percent of the tumors showed positive cytoplasmic COX-2 expression, whereas 44% of cases were completely COX-2-negative. There were no significant correlations between COX-2 expression and sex, age, grade or tumor location. However, COX-2 expression revealed a significant correlation with tumor stage (P = 0.01) and distant metastasis (P = 0.02), and a borderline association with lymph node involvement (P = 0.07). Tumors with high COX-2 expression showed a higher recurrence rate than tumors with no expression (P < 0.009). In univariate Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, there was a significant (P = 0.026) difference in disease-free survival between COX-2-positive and negative tumors in favor of the latter. COX-2 expression did not significantly predict disease-specific survival, which was much shorter for COX-2-positive tumors. In multivariate (COX) models, COX-2 did not appear among the independent predictors of disease-free survival or disease-specific survival. CONCLUSION: COX-2 expression seems to provide useful prognostic information in CRC, while predicting the patients at high risk for recurrent disease.
AIM: To correlate cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression profile with clinical and pathological variables to assess their prognostic/predictive value in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). METHODS: Archival tumor samples were analyzed using immunohistochemistry for COX-2 expression in 94 patients with CRC. Patients were diagnosed and treated at the Departments of Surgery and Oncology, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Saudi Arabia. RESULTS: Fifty-six percent of the tumors showed positive cytoplasmic COX-2 expression, whereas 44% of cases were completely COX-2-negative. There were no significant correlations between COX-2 expression and sex, age, grade or tumor location. However, COX-2 expression revealed a significant correlation with tumor stage (P = 0.01) and distant metastasis (P = 0.02), and a borderline association with lymph node involvement (P = 0.07). Tumors with high COX-2 expression showed a higher recurrence rate than tumors with no expression (P < 0.009). In univariate Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, there was a significant (P = 0.026) difference in disease-free survival between COX-2-positive and negative tumors in favor of the latter. COX-2 expression did not significantly predict disease-specific survival, which was much shorter for COX-2-positive tumors. In multivariate (COX) models, COX-2 did not appear among the independent predictors of disease-free survival or disease-specific survival. CONCLUSION:COX-2 expression seems to provide useful prognostic information in CRC, while predicting the patients at high risk for recurrent disease.
Authors: W Kutchera; D A Jones; N Matsunami; J Groden; T M McIntyre; G A Zimmerman; R L White; S M Prescott Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1996-05-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: S Tomozawa; N H Tsuno; E Sunami; K Hatano; J Kitayama; T Osada; S Saito; T Tsuruo; Y Shibata; H Nagawa Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Maqbool Ahmed; Azhar R Hussain; Abdul K Siraj; Shahab Uddin; Nasser Al-Sanea; Fouad Al-Dayel; Mohammed Al-Assiri; Shaham Beg; Khawla S Al-Kuraya Journal: Mol Cancer Date: 2015-07-10 Impact factor: 27.401
Authors: Henrikas Pauzas; Ugne Gyvyte; Tadas Latkauskas; Laura Kairevice; Paulius Lizdenis; Saulius Svagzdys; Erika Birgiolaite; Irma Kuliaviene; Juozas Kupcinskas; Algimantas Tamelis Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Date: 2020-04-22 Impact factor: 2.430
Authors: Abdulkader M Albasri; Mohammed A Elkablawy; Akbar S Hussainy; Hala M Yousif; Ahmed S Alhujaily Journal: Saudi Med J Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 1.484