Literature DB >> 22552673

Increased use of intramedullary nails for intertrochanteric proximal femoral fractures in veterans affairs hospitals: a comparative effectiveness study.

Tiffany A Radcliff1, Elizabeth Regan, Diane C Cowper Ripley, Evelyn Hutt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intramedullary nails for stabilizing intertrochanteric proximal femoral fractures have been available since the early 1990s. The nails are inserted percutaneously and have theoretical mechanical advantages over plates and screws, but they have not been demonstrated to improve patient outcomes. Still, use of intramedullary nails is becoming more common. The goal of this study was to examine trends in the use and associated outcomes of intramedullary nailing compared with sliding hip screws in Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals.
METHODS: Review of the VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) data identified 5244 male patients in whom an intertrochanteric proximal femoral fracture had been treated in a VA hospital between 1998 and 2005. The overall sample was used to assess trends in device use, thirty-day mortality, thirty-day surgical complications, and one-year mortality. Next, propensity score matching methods were used to compare 1013 patients identified as having been treated with an intramedullary nail with 1013 patients who had a sliding-screw procedure. Multiple logistic regression models for the matched sample were used to calculate odds ratios for mortality and complications according to the choice of internal fracture fixation.
RESULTS: Use of intramedullary nails in VA facilities increased from 1998 through 2005 and varied by geographic region. Unadjusted mortality and complication percentages were similar for the two procedures, with approximately 8% of patients dying within thirty days after surgery, 28% dying within one year, and 19% having at least one perioperative complication. While the choice of an intramedullary nail or sliding-screw procedure was related to the geographic region, year of surgery, surgeon characteristics, and several patient characteristics, it was not associated with thirty-day outcomes in either the descriptive or the multiple regression analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Intramedullary nail use increased from 1998 through 2005 but did not decrease perioperative mortality or comorbidity compared with standard plate-and-screw devices for patients treated for intertrochanteric proximal femoral fractures in VA facilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22552673     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  18 in total

1.  The influence of pre-existing radiographic osteoarthritis on functional outcome after trochanteric fracture.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Benjamin Buecking; Tim Schwarting; Florian Debus; Steffen Ruchholtz; Christoph Bliemel; Michael Frink; Philipp Lechler
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Comparative study of InterTAN and Dynamic Hip Screw in treatment of femoral intertrochanteric injury and wound.

Authors:  Qiang Wang; Xin Yang; Hua-Zheng He; Li-Jun Dong; De-Gang Huang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

3.  Loss of offset after pertrochanteric hip fractures affects hip function one year after surgery with a short intramedullary nail. A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Max Gordon; Per-Olov Berntsson; Erik Sjölund; Yilmaz Demir; Carl Johan Hedbeck; André Stark; Olof Sköldenberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Complications of short versus long cephalomedullary nail for intertrochanteric femur fractures, minimum 1 year follow-up.

Authors:  Josh Vaughn; Eric Cohen; Bryan G Vopat; Patrick Kane; Emily Abbood; Christopher Born
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-10-22

5.  A Simple Method to Improve Detection of Femoral Nail Abutment in the Distal Femur: A Computer Modeling Study.

Authors:  Harminder Sarai; Beat Schmutz; Michael Schuetz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  Distal locked and unlocked nailing for perthrochanteric fractures--a prospective comparative randomized study.

Authors:  Xing Li; Liping Zhang; Zhiyong Hou; Zhao Meng; Wei Chen; Pengcheng Wang; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  The long and short of cephalomedullary nails in the treatment of osteoporotic pertrochanteric fracture.

Authors:  Choon Chiet Hong; Nazrul Nashi; Milindu Chanaka Makandura; Jiong Hao Jonathan Tan; Luke Peter; Diarmuid Murphy
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 1.858

8.  Comparing Survival Following Hip Fracture Repair in VHA and Non-VHA Facilities.

Authors:  Evelyn Hutt; Tiffany A Radcliff; William Henderson; Matthew Maciejewski; Diane Cowper-Ripley; Emily Whitfield
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2015-03

9.  Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus dynamic hip screw fixation for treatment of osteoporotic type 31-A1 intertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Xianshang Zeng; Nan Zhang; Dan Zeng; Lili Zhang; Ping Xu; Lei Cao; Weiguang Yu; Ke Zhan; Xinchao Zhang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.671

10.  Internal fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: a clinical comparison of two implant designs.

Authors:  Ran Tao; Yue Lu; Hua Xu; Zhen-Yu Zhou; You-Hua Wang; Fan Liu
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-02-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.