Literature DB >> 22552500

Prospective evaluation of a single-sided innervated gluteal artery perforator flap for reconstruction for extensive and recurrent pilonidal sinus disease: functional, aesthetic, and patient-reported long-term outcomes.

Klaus F Schrögendorfer1, Werner Haslik, Oskar C Aszmann, Martin Vierhapper, Manfred Frey, David B Lumenta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treating large and extensive pilonidal sinus disease is a challenging task. Long-term reports on flaps suitable for coverage of large, wide, local-excision defects are sparse. We prospectively evaluated data with a minimum 1-year follow-up of the use of a single-sided, innervated, superior gluteal artery perforator flap.
METHODS: Twenty-one patients (1 woman, 20 men) with a median age of 26 years (min - max = 18 - 46) were included in the study period from September 2005 to April 2010. We recorded flap size, major and minor complications, hospital length of stay, impairment in activities of daily living, pain, aesthetic outcomes, and sensibility in the gluteal region (PSSD, pressure-specified sensory device) at 6 and 12 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: The mean defect size (±SD) was 13.0 ± 1.9 × 8.6 ± 1.3 × 5.5 ± 1.2 cm (height × width × depth), and median length of hospital stay was 9 days (range = 7-11). Only two patients developed minor wound-healing complications. Visual analog pain scales significantly improved, with no pain detectable at 12 months postoperatively (p < 0.0001). The aesthetic appearance of the results was good in the majority of patients (61.9-85.7 %). PSSD showed gradual normalization, with retained sensibility in the flap area over 12 months postoperatively (p = 0.0232). During the median 36-month (range = 20-60) follow-up, we have not observed any recurrence in the operated area.
CONCLUSIONS: The innervated superior gluteal artery perforator flap is a useful technique for covering large and recurrent pilonidal sinus defects following wide local excision and represents an excellent tool in the surgical armamentarium for achieving long-lasting outcomes in this young group of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22552500     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1639-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  30 in total

1.  Pathology of postanal pilonidal sinus; its bearing on treatment.

Authors:  D H PATEY; R W SCARFF
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1946-10-05       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Treatment of the chronic pilonidal sinus wound with a local perforator-assisted transposition flap.

Authors:  Rebecca Nelson; Don Lalonde
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Definite surgical treatment of complicated recurrent pilonidal disease with a modified fasciocutaneous V-Y advancement flap.

Authors:  T Schoeller; G Wechselberger; A Otto; C Papp
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  A review of three popular methods of treatment of postanal (pilonidal) sinus disease.

Authors:  M J Notaras
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  V-Y rotation advancement fasciocutaneous flap for excisional defects of pilonidal sinus.

Authors:  Nezih Sungur; Ugur Koçer; Afsin Uysal; Cafer Arslan; Harun Cöloglu; Gürhan Ulusoy
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  High body mass index as a possible risk factor for pilonidal sinus disease in adolescents.

Authors:  Irfan Serdar Arda; L Hakan Güney; Sinasi Sevmiş; Akgün Hiçsönmez
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Reconstruction following excision of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus with a perforator-based fasciocutaneous Limberg flap.

Authors:  Abdou M A Darwish; A Hassanin
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 8.  Pilonidal disease.

Authors:  Tracy L Hull; James Wu
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Superior gluteal artery perforator flap in the reconstruction of pilonidal sinus.

Authors:  Tahsin Oguz Acartürk; Cem K Parsak; Gürhan Sakman; Orhan Demircan
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Patient characteristics and symptoms in chronic pilonidal sinus disease.

Authors:  K Søndenaa; E Andersen; I Nesvik; J A Søreide
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  4 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of a single-sided innervated gluteal artery perforator flap for reconstruction of extensive and recurrent pilonidal sinus disease: functional, aesthetic, and patient-reported long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Jonathan E Efron
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  A proposed staging system for chronic symptomatic pilonidal sinus disease and results in patients treated with stage-based approach.

Authors:  Ali Guner; Arif B Cekic; Aydin Boz; Serdar Turkyilmaz; Uzer Kucuktulu
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Common surgical procedures in pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis, merged data analysis, and comprehensive study on recurrence.

Authors:  V K Stauffer; M M Luedi; P Kauf; M Schmid; M Diekmann; K Wieferich; B Schnüriger; D Doll
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Impact of geography and surgical approach on recurrence in global pilonidal sinus disease.

Authors:  Dietrich Doll; Andriu Orlik; Katharina Maier; Peter Kauf; Marco Schmid; Maja Diekmann; Andreas P Vogt; Verena K Stauffer; Markus M Luedi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.