Literature DB >> 22552144

DNA breakage drives nuclear search.

Grzegorz Ira1, Philip J Hastings.   

Abstract

The search for a homologous template is a fundamental, yet largely uncharacterized, reaction in DNA double-strand break repair. Two reports now demonstrate that broken chromosomes increase their movement and explore large volumes of nuclear space searching for a homologous template. Break mobility requires resection and recombination enzymes, as well as damage-checkpoint components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22552144      PMCID: PMC4495951          DOI: 10.1038/ncb2494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Cell Biol        ISSN: 1465-7392            Impact factor:   28.824


  14 in total

1.  Increased mobility of double-strand breaks requires Mec1, Rad9 and the homologous recombination machinery.

Authors:  Vincent Dion; Véronique Kalck; Chihiro Horigome; Benjamin D Towbin; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2012-04-08       Impact factor: 28.824

2.  Mechanisms that regulate localization of a DNA double-strand break to the nuclear periphery.

Authors:  Pranav Oza; Sue L Jaspersen; Adriana Miele; Job Dekker; Craig L Peterson
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Double-strand breaks in heterochromatin move outside of a dynamic HP1a domain to complete recombinational repair.

Authors:  Irene Chiolo; Aki Minoda; Serafin U Colmenares; Aris Polyzos; Sylvain V Costes; Gary H Karpen
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Increased chromosome mobility facilitates homology search during recombination.

Authors:  Judith Miné-Hattab; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2012-04-08       Impact factor: 28.824

5.  Double Holliday junctions are intermediates of DNA break repair.

Authors:  Malgorzata Bzymek; Nathaniel H Thayer; Steve D Oh; Nancy Kleckner; Neil Hunter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The requirement for ATP hydrolysis by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 is bypassed by mating-type heterozygosity or RAD54 in high copy.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Morgan; Naseem Shah; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Spatial organization of the mouse genome and its role in recurrent chromosomal translocations.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Rachel Patton McCord; Yu-Jui Ho; Bryan R Lajoie; Dominic G Hildebrand; Aline C Simon; Michael S Becker; Frederick W Alt; Job Dekker
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  The replication checkpoint protects fork stability by releasing transcribed genes from nuclear pores.

Authors:  Rodrigo Bermejo; Thelma Capra; Rachel Jossen; Arianna Colosio; Camilla Frattini; Walter Carotenuto; Andrea Cocito; Ylli Doksani; Hannah Klein; Belén Gómez-González; Andrés Aguilera; Yuki Katou; Katsuhiko Shirahige; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Single-molecule imaging of DNA pairing by RecA reveals a three-dimensional homology search.

Authors:  Anthony L Forget; Stephen C Kowalczykowski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The dynamics of homologous pairing during mating type interconversion in budding yeast.

Authors:  Peter L Houston; James R Broach
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  5 in total

1.  Interplay between Ku and Replication Protein A in the Restriction of Exo1-mediated DNA Break End Resection.

Authors:  Danielle S Krasner; James M Daley; Patrick Sung; Hengyao Niu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Centromere tethering confines chromosome domains.

Authors:  Jolien Suzanne Verdaasdonk; Paula Andrea Vasquez; Raymond Mario Barry; Timothy Barry; Scott Goodwin; M Gregory Forest; Kerry Bloom
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Checkpoint kinases and the INO80 nucleosome remodeling complex enhance global chromatin mobility in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Andrew Seeber; Vincent Dion; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Chromosome territories reposition during DNA damage-repair response.

Authors:  Ishita S Mehta; Mugdha Kulashreshtha; Sandeep Chakraborty; Ullas Kolthur-Seetharam; Basuthkar J Rao
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 13.583

5.  Chromosome territory relocation during DNA repair requires nuclear myosin 1 recruitment to chromatin mediated by ϒ-H2AX signaling.

Authors:  Mugdha Kulashreshtha; Ishita S Mehta; Pradeep Kumar; Basuthkar J Rao
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 16.971

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.