INTRODUCTION: The physical properties of proton beam radiation may offer advantages for treating patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its utility for the treatment of medically inoperable stage I NSCLC patients with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is unknown. METHODS: Outcomes for patients with medically inoperable stage I NSCLC treated with proton SBRT were retrospectively analyzed. Proton SBRT was selected as the treatment modality based on pulmonary comorbidities (n = 5), prior chest radiation or/and multiple primary tumors (n = 7), or other reasons (n = 3). Treatments were administered using 2 to 3 proton beams. Treatment toxicity was scored according to common toxicity criteria for adverse events version 4 criteria. RESULTS: Fifteen consecutive patients and 20 tumors were treated with proton SBRT to 42 to 50 Gy(relative biological effectiveness) in 3 to 5 fractions between July 2008 and September 2010. Treatments were well tolerated with only one case of grade 2 fatigue, one case of grade 2 dermatitis, three cases of rib fracture (maximum grade 2), and one case of grade 3 pneumonitis in a patient with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. With a median follow-up of 24.1 months, 2-year overall survival and local control rates were 64% (95% confidence limits, 34%-83%) and 100% (83%-100%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that proton SBRT is effective and well tolerated in this unfavorable group of patients. Prospective clinical trials testing the utility of proton SBRT in stage I NSCLC are warranted.
INTRODUCTION: The physical properties of proton beam radiation may offer advantages for treating patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its utility for the treatment of medically inoperable stage I NSCLCpatients with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is unknown. METHODS: Outcomes for patients with medically inoperable stage I NSCLC treated with proton SBRT were retrospectively analyzed. Proton SBRT was selected as the treatment modality based on pulmonary comorbidities (n = 5), prior chest radiation or/and multiple primary tumors (n = 7), or other reasons (n = 3). Treatments were administered using 2 to 3 proton beams. Treatment toxicity was scored according to common toxicity criteria for adverse events version 4 criteria. RESULTS: Fifteen consecutive patients and 20 tumors were treated with proton SBRT to 42 to 50 Gy(relative biological effectiveness) in 3 to 5 fractions between July 2008 and September 2010. Treatments were well tolerated with only one case of grade 2 fatigue, one case of grade 2 dermatitis, three cases of rib fracture (maximum grade 2), and one case of grade 3 pneumonitis in a patient with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. With a median follow-up of 24.1 months, 2-year overall survival and local control rates were 64% (95% confidence limits, 34%-83%) and 100% (83%-100%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that proton SBRT is effective and well tolerated in this unfavorable group of patients. Prospective clinical trials testing the utility of proton SBRT in stage I NSCLC are warranted.
Authors: R Pellegrino; G Viegi; V Brusasco; R O Crapo; F Burgos; R Casaburi; A Coates; C P M van der Grinten; P Gustafsson; J Hankinson; R Jensen; D C Johnson; N MacIntyre; R McKay; M R Miller; D Navajas; O F Pedersen; J Wanger Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Hanne M Kooy; Stanley J Rosenthal; Martijn Engelsman; Alejandro Mazal; Roelf L Slopsema; Harald Paganetti; Jacob B Flanz Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2005-12-06 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Joe Y Chang; Ritsuko Komaki; Charles Lu; Hong Y Wen; Pamela K Allen; Anne Tsao; Michael Gillin; Radhe Mohan; James D Cox Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-03-22 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Qi Liu; Tracy S A Underwood; Jong Kung; Meng Wang; Hsiao-Ming Lu; Harald Paganetti; Kathryn D Held; Theodore S Hong; Jason A Efstathiou; Henning Willers Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Feng Liu; An Tai; Percy Lee; Tithi Biswas; George X Ding; Isaam El Naqa; Jimm Grimm; Andrew Jackson; Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Tamara LaCouture; Billy Loo; Moyed Miften; Timothy Solberg; X Allen Li Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2016-11-18 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Joe Y Chang; Wencheng Zhang; Ritsuko Komaki; Noah C Choi; Shen Chan; Daniel Gomez; Michael O'Reilly; Melenda Jeter; Michael Gillin; Xiaorong Zhu; Xiaodong Zhang; Radhe Mohan; Stephen Swisher; Stephen Hahn; James D Cox Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2017-01-28 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Tejan P Diwanji; Pranshu Mohindra; Melissa Vyfhuis; James W Snider; Chaitanya Kalavagunta; Sina Mossahebi; Jen Yu; Steven Feigenberg; Shahed N Badiyan Journal: Transl Lung Cancer Res Date: 2017-04
Authors: Yanjing Li; Michael Dykstra; Till D Best; Jennifer Pursley; Nitish Chopra; Florence K Keane; Melin J Khandekar; Gregory C Sharp; Harald Paganetti; Henning Willers; Florian J Fintelmann; Clemens Grassberger Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2019-04-20 Impact factor: 6.280