Literature DB >> 22551080

Availability, brands, labelling and Salmonella contamination of raw pet food in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area.

S Mehlenbacher1, J Churchill, K E Olsen, J B Bender.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to characterize the commercially available raw meat pet food diets in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area by (i) determining the number and types of available diets; (ii) assessing pet food stores and brand labels for the provision of precautionary statements regarding the risk of foodborne illness from raw meat; (ii) assessing the labels for Food and Drug Administration (FDA)/American Association of Feed Control Officials (AAFCO) required content and nutrient-related information; and (iv) culturing purchased diets for the presence of Salmonella. Sixty raw meat diets were purchased, representing 11 different brands from eight different stores. Diets were readily available in the form of raw-frozen, dehydrated or freeze-dried varieties from different protein sources, such as lamb, beef, chicken or duck. All stores promoted raw meat diets; however, none provided foodborne illness warnings. Brands varied greatly in their precautionary statements; none of the diets underwent feeding trials; and nutritional adequacy substantiation was through formulation only. The first five ingredients tended to consist of meat, organ meat (by-products), vegetables, grains and ground bones. Currently, it is required that pet foods have an AAFCO nutritional adequacy statement and provide a guaranteed analysis table. Three brands did not meet these FDA requirements. Thirty-one (51.7%) of the 60 raw meat diets underwent some degree of processing including dehydration, freeze-drying or high-pressure pasteurization. Four of the 60 raw diets (7%) tested positive for Salmonella. Analysis of raw meat pet food labels indicated a lack of foodborne illness warnings. Based on these findings, we recommend that warning statements similar to those required by the United States Department of Agriculture and placed on labels of raw meat intended for human consumption be provided on the labels of raw meat pet food diets.
© 2012 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22551080     DOI: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2012.01491.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health        ISSN: 1863-1959            Impact factor:   2.702


  5 in total

1.  Clients' knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to pet nutrition and exercise at a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Michelle Evason; Michaela Peace; George Munguia; Jason Stull
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 2.  Raw diets for dogs and cats: a review, with particular reference to microbiological hazards.

Authors:  R H Davies; J R Lawes; A D Wales
Journal:  J Small Anim Pract       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 1.522

3.  Presence of pathogenic bacteria in faeces from dogs fed raw meat-based diets or dry kibble.

Authors:  Ellinor Runesvärd; Camilla Wikström; Lise-Lotte Fernström; Ingrid Hansson
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 2.695

4.  Hygiene quality and presence of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in raw food diets for dogs.

Authors:  Oskar Nilsson
Journal:  Infect Ecol Epidemiol       Date:  2015-10-20

5.  Emergence of Brucella suis in dogs in New South Wales, Australia: clinical findings and implications for zoonotic transmission.

Authors:  Siobhan M Mor; Anke K Wiethoelter; Amanda Lee; Barbara Moloney; Daniel R James; Richard Malik
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.741

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.