PURPOSE: Self-management is a dynamic process in which individuals actively manage a chronic illness. Self-management models are limited in their specification of the processes of self-management. The purpose of this article is to delineate processes of self-management in order to help direct interventions and improve health outcomes for individuals with a chronic illness. DESIGN: Qualitative metasynthesis techniques were used to analyze 101 studies published between January 2000 and April 2011 that described processes of self-management in chronic illness. METHODS: Self-management processes were extracted from each article and were coded. Similar codes were clustered into categories. The analysis continued until a final categorization was reached. FINDINGS: Three categories of self-management processes were identified: focusing on illness needs; activating resources; and living with a chronic illness. Tasks and skills were delineated for each category. CONCLUSIONS: This metasynthesis expands on current descriptions of self-management processes by specifying a more complete spectrum of self-management processes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Healthcare providers can best facilitate self-management by coordinating self-management activities, by recognizing that different self-management processes vary in importance to patients over time, and by having ongoing communication with patients and providers to create appropriate self-management plans.
PURPOSE: Self-management is a dynamic process in which individuals actively manage a chronic illness. Self-management models are limited in their specification of the processes of self-management. The purpose of this article is to delineate processes of self-management in order to help direct interventions and improve health outcomes for individuals with a chronic illness. DESIGN: Qualitative metasynthesis techniques were used to analyze 101 studies published between January 2000 and April 2011 that described processes of self-management in chronic illness. METHODS: Self-management processes were extracted from each article and were coded. Similar codes were clustered into categories. The analysis continued until a final categorization was reached. FINDINGS: Three categories of self-management processes were identified: focusing on illness needs; activating resources; and living with a chronic illness. Tasks and skills were delineated for each category. CONCLUSIONS: This metasynthesis expands on current descriptions of self-management processes by specifying a more complete spectrum of self-management processes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Healthcare providers can best facilitate self-management by coordinating self-management activities, by recognizing that different self-management processes vary in importance to patients over time, and by having ongoing communication with patients and providers to create appropriate self-management plans.
Authors: Ruth McCorkle; Elizabeth Ercolano; Mark Lazenby; Dena Schulman-Green; Lynne S Schilling; Kate Lorig; Edward H Wagner Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2011-01-04 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Peter W Harvey; John N Petkov; Gary Misan; Jeffrey Fuller; Malcolm W Battersby; Teofilo N Cayetano; Kate Warren; Paul Holmes Journal: Aust Health Rev Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: Nancy S Redeker; Andrea K Knies; Christopher Hollenbeak; H Klar Yaggi; John Cline; Laura Andrews; Daniel Jacoby; Anna Sullivan; Meghan O'Connell; Joanne Iennaco; Lisa Finoia; Sangchoon Jeon Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 2.226