Literature DB >> 22550945

Moral distress and structural empowerment among a national sample of Israeli intensive care nurses.

Freda DeKeyser Ganz1, Ofra Raanan, Rabia Khalaila, Kochav Bennaroch, Shiri Scherman, Madeleine Bruttin, Ziva Sastiel, Naomi Farkash Fink, Julie Benbenishty.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to determine levels of structural empowerment, moral distress, and the association between them among intensive care nurses.
BACKGROUND: Structural empowerment is the ability to access sources of power. Moral distress is the painful feelings experienced when a person knows the right thing to do but cannot do so due to external constraints. Several studies suggest a theoretical relationship between these concepts.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive correlational study.
METHODS: Members of the Evidence Based Nursing Practice Committee of the Israeli Society for Cardiology and Critical Care Nurses recruited a convenience sample of intensive care nurses from their respective institutions and units. Nurses were asked to complete three questionnaires (demographic and work characteristics, Moral Distress Scale, and the Conditions of Work Effectiveness Questionnaire-II). Data were collected between May-September 2009.
RESULTS: Intensive Care nurses had moderate levels of structural empowerment, low levels of moral distress frequency, and moderately high moral distress intensity. A weak correlation was found between moral distress frequency and structural empowerment. No other structural empowerment component was associated with moral distress. Work characteristics as opposed to demographic characteristics were more associated with the study variables.
CONCLUSIONS: This study weakly supports the association between structural empowerment and moral distress. It also provides further evidence to the theory of structural empowerment as characterized in the critical care environment. Further studies are indicated to determine what other factors might be associated with moral distress.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22550945     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06020.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  5 in total

Review 1.  Moral distress in medical education and training.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Berger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Moral distress and its interconnection with moral sensitivity and moral resilience: viewed from the philosophy of Viktor E. Frankl.

Authors:  Kim Lützén; Béatrice Ewalds-Kvist
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  ICU staffing feature phenotypes and their relationship with patients' outcomes: an unsupervised machine learning analysis.

Authors:  Fernando G Zampieri; Jorge I F Salluh; Luciano C P Azevedo; Jeremy M Kahn; Lucas P Damiani; Lunna P Borges; William N Viana; Roberto Costa; Thiago D Corrêa; Dieter E S Araya; Marcelo O Maia; Marcus A Ferez; Alexandre G R Carvalho; Marcos F Knibel; Ulisses O Melo; Marcelo S Santino; Thiago Lisboa; Eliana B Caser; Bruno A M P Besen; Fernando A Bozza; Derek C Angus; Marcio Soares
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Ethical decision-making climate, moral distress, and intention to leave among ICU professionals in a tertiary academic hospital center.

Authors:  Henry Silverman; Tracey Wilson; Samuel Tisherman; Raya Kheirbek; Trishna Mukherjee; Ali Tabatabai; Karen McQuillan; Rachel Hausladen; Melissa Davis-Gilbert; Eunsung Cho; Kerri Bouchard; Samantha Dove; Julie Landon; Michele Zimmer
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 2.834

Review 5.  Moral Distress Scores of Nurses Working in Intensive Care Units for Adults Using Corley's Scale: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Noemi Giannetta; Giulia Villa; Loris Bonetti; Sara Dionisi; Andrea Pozza; Stefano Rolandi; Debora Rosa; Duilio Fiorenzo Manara
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.