Literature DB >> 22550309

Immediate hypersensitivity reaction to gadolinium-based MR contrast media.

Jae-Woo Jung1, Hye-Ryun Kang, Min-Hye Kim, Whal Lee, Kyung-Up Min, Moon-Hee Han, Sang-Heon Cho.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence and risk factors of immediate hypersensitivity reactions to gadolinium-based magnetic resonance (MR) contrast agents.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and a waiver of informed consent were obtained. A retrospective study of patients who had been given gadolinium-based MR contrast media between August 2004 and July 2010 was performed by reviewing their electronic medical records. In addition to data on immediate hypersensitivity reaction, the kinds of MR contrast media and demographic data including age, sex, and comorbidity were collected. To compare the groups, the χ(2) test, Fisher exact test, χ(2) test for trend, Student t test, analysis of variance test, and multiple logistic regression test were performed.
RESULTS: A total of 112 immediate hypersensitivity reactions (0.079% of 141 623 total doses) were identified in 102 patients (0.121% of 84 367 total patients). Among the six evaluated MR contrast media, gadodiamide had the lowest rate (0.013%) of immediate hypersensitivity reactions, while gadobenate dimeglumine had the highest rate (0.22%). The rate for immediate hypersensitivity reactions was significantly higher in female patients (odds ratio = 1.687; 95% confidence interval: 1.143, 2.491) and in patients with allergies and asthma (odds ratio = 2.829; 95% confidence interval: 1.427, 5.610). Patients with a previous history of immediate hypersensitivity reactions had a higher rate of recurrence after reexposure to MR contrast media (30%) compared with the incidence rate in total patients (P < .0001). The incidence of immediate hypersensitivity reactions increased depending on the number of times patients were exposed to MR contrast media (P for trend = .036). The most common symptom was urticaria (91.1%), and anaphylaxis occurred in 11 cases (9.8%). The mortality rate was 0.0007% because of one fatality.
CONCLUSION: The incidence of immediate hypersensitivity reactions to MR contrast media was 0.079%, and the recurrence rate of hypersensitivity reactions was 30% in patients with previous reactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22550309     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12112025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  55 in total

Review 1.  Gadolinium contrast agents for CNS imaging: current concepts and clinical evidence.

Authors:  E Kanal; K Maravilla; H A Rowley
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography in pediatric patients with chronic kidney disease: initial experience with ferumoxytol.

Authors:  Aarti Luhar; Sarah Khan; J Paul Finn; Shahnaz Ghahremani; Rachel Griggs; Joshua Zaritsky; Isidro Salusky; Theodore R Hall
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-04-08

3.  Ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography is a feasible method for the clinical evaluation of lower extremity arterial disease.

Authors:  Joy P Walker; Emily Nosova; Monica Sigovan; Joseph Rapp; Marlene S Grenon; Christopher D Owens; Warren J Gasper; David A Saloner
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 1.466

Review 4.  Diagnostic yield of MRI for pediatric hearing loss: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bart Kachniarz; Jenny X Chen; Sapideh Gilani; Jennifer J Shin
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 5.  Gadolinium retention in the body: what we know and what we can do.

Authors:  Enrico Tedeschi; Ferdinando Caranci; Flavio Giordano; Valentina Angelini; Sirio Cocozza; Arturo Brunetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Comparison of multiparametric and biparametric MRI of the prostate: are gadolinium-based contrast agents needed for routine examinations?

Authors:  Daniel Junker; Fabian Steinkohl; Veronika Fritz; Jasmin Bektic; Theodoros Tokas; Friedrich Aigner; Thomas R W Herrmann; Michael Rieger; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  [Contrast agents in radiology: current agents approved, recommendations, and safety aspects].

Authors:  P Reimer; R Vosshenrich
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 8.  Gadolinium deposition and the potential for toxicological sequelae - A literature review of issues surrounding gadolinium-based contrast agents.

Authors:  Kerry A Layne; Paul I Dargan; John R H Archer; David M Wood
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  Is MRI imaging in pediatric age totally safe? A critical reprisal.

Authors:  Sergio Salerno; Claudio Granata; Marco Trapenese; Vittorio Cannata; Davide Curione; Maria Camilla Rossi Espagnet; Andrea Magistrelli; Paolo Tomà
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Physicians' awareness of gadolinium retention and MRI timing practices in the longitudinal management of pituitary tumors: a "Pituitary Society" survey.

Authors:  Lisa B Nachtigall; Niki Karavitaki; Katja Kiseljak-Vassiliades; Luma Ghalib; Hidenori Fukuoka; Luis V Syro; Daniel Kelly; Maria Fleseriu
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.