BACKGROUND: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and alternative chemotherapy regimens strive to maintain efficacy while minimizing toxicity in locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) treatment. Our experience with concurrent IMRT and taxane-based chemotherapy is presented. METHODS: A retrospective review of 150 consecutive patients with LAHNC treated with IMRT and concurrent taxane-based chemotherapy with curative intent was performed. The IMRT fractionation regimen consisted of 69.3 Gy to gross disease (2.1 Gy/fraction) and 56.1 Gy to prophylactic nodal sites (1.7 Gy/fraction). Weekly paclitaxel (30 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC], 1) were given concurrently to all patients, and 69% received weekly induction with paclitaxel (60 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC, 2). RESULTS: Over 90% of patients received the prescribed radiation dose. Ninety-six percent completed five or more cycles of concurrent chemotherapy, with similar tolerability for induction chemotherapy. A percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube was required in 80 patients, with 10 maintaining PEG use >18 months. Acute grade 4 mucositis and dermatitis developed in 2.0% and 4.0% of patients, respectively. No patient experienced nadir sepsis, grade ≥3 late xerostomia, or significant nephropathy or gastrointestinal toxicity. Median follow-up was 30 months. The 3-year locoregional control rate was 83.2% with disease-free survival and overall survival rates of 78.8% and 76.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Rates of acute and late toxicities were low, with excellent radiation dose delivery and impressive tumor control at 3 years, suggesting that concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel with IMRT is a reasonable therapeutic option for the curative treatment of LAHNC.
BACKGROUND: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and alternative chemotherapy regimens strive to maintain efficacy while minimizing toxicity in locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) treatment. Our experience with concurrent IMRT and taxane-based chemotherapy is presented. METHODS: A retrospective review of 150 consecutive patients with LAHNC treated with IMRT and concurrent taxane-based chemotherapy with curative intent was performed. The IMRT fractionation regimen consisted of 69.3 Gy to gross disease (2.1 Gy/fraction) and 56.1 Gy to prophylactic nodal sites (1.7 Gy/fraction). Weekly paclitaxel (30 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC], 1) were given concurrently to all patients, and 69% received weekly induction with paclitaxel (60 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC, 2). RESULTS: Over 90% of patients received the prescribed radiation dose. Ninety-six percent completed five or more cycles of concurrent chemotherapy, with similar tolerability for induction chemotherapy. A percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube was required in 80 patients, with 10 maintaining PEG use >18 months. Acute grade 4 mucositis and dermatitis developed in 2.0% and 4.0% of patients, respectively. No patient experienced nadir sepsis, grade ≥3 late xerostomia, or significant nephropathy or gastrointestinal toxicity. Median follow-up was 30 months. The 3-year locoregional control rate was 83.2% with disease-free survival and overall survival rates of 78.8% and 76.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Rates of acute and late toxicities were low, with excellent radiation dose delivery and impressive tumor control at 3 years, suggesting that concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel with IMRT is a reasonable therapeutic option for the curative treatment of LAHNC.
Authors: Felix Y Feng; Hyungjin M Kim; Teresa H Lyden; Marc J Haxer; Francis P Worden; Mary Feng; Jeffrey S Moyer; Mark E Prince; Thomas E Carey; Gregory T Wolf; Carol R Bradford; Douglas B Chepeha; Avraham Eisbruch Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-04-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jacques Ferlay; Hai-Rim Shin; Freddie Bray; David Forman; Colin Mathers; Donald Maxwell Parkin Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2010-12-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: S Staar; V Rudat; H Stuetzer; A Dietz; P Volling; M Schroeder; M Flentje; H E Eckel; R P Mueller Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2001-08-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: M Suntharalingam; M L Haas; B A Conley; M J Egorin; S Levy; S Sivasailam; J M Herman; M C Jacobs; W C Gray; R A Ord; J A Aisner; D A Van Echo Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2000-04-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Christopher M Nutting; James P Morden; Kevin J Harrington; Teresa Guerrero Urbano; Shreerang A Bhide; Catharine Clark; Elizabeth A Miles; Aisha B Miah; Kate Newbold; MaryAnne Tanay; Fawzi Adab; Sarah J Jefferies; Christopher Scrase; Beng K Yap; Roger P A'Hern; Mark A Sydenham; Marie Emson; Emma Hall Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: David J Adelstein; Yi Li; George L Adams; Henry Wagner; Julie A Kish; John F Ensley; David E Schuller; Arlene A Forastiere Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-01-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lova Sun; Danielle Candelieri-Surette; Tori Anglin-Foote; Julie A Lynch; Kara N Maxwell; Christopher D'Avella; Aditi Singh; Erin Aakhus; Roger B Cohen; Robert M Brody Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2022-09-22 Impact factor: 8.961
Authors: M G Fury; E J Sherman; S S Rao; S Wolden; S Smith-Marrone; B Mueller; K K Ng; P R Dutta; D Y Gelblum; J L Lee; R Shen; S Kurz; N Katabi; S Haque; N Y Lee; D G Pfister Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-02-03 Impact factor: 32.976