Literature DB >> 22549719

The influence of bedding materials on bio-aerosol exposure in dairy barns.

Sadegh Samadi1, Frank J C M van Eerdenburg, Ali-Reza Jamshidifard, Giovanna P Otten, Marijke Droppert, Dick J J Heederik, Inge M Wouters.   

Abstract

Bio-aerosol is a well-known cause of respiratory diseases. Exposure to bio-aerosols has been reported previously in dairy barns, but little is known about the sources of bio-aerosol. Bedding materials might be a significant source or substrate for bio-aerosol exposure. The aim of this study was to explore bio-aerosol exposure levels and its determinants in dairy barns with various bedding materials. Dust samples were collected at dairy barns using various bedding materials. Samples were analyzed for endotoxin and β(1 → 3)-glucan contents. Culturable bacteria and fungi were sampled by the Anderson N6 impactor. Exposure models were constructed using linear mixed models. The personal exposure levels to dust, endotoxin, and β(1 → 3)-glucan differed significantly between the barns utilizing diverse main bedding types (P<0.05), with the highest levels (GM: dust, 1.38 mg/m(3); endotoxin, 895 EU/m(3); β(1 → 3)-glucan, 7.84 μg/m(3)) in barns with compost bedding vs the lowest in barns with sawdust bedding (GM: dust, 0.51 mg/m(3); endotoxin, 183 EU/m(3); β(1 → 3)-glucan, 1.11 μg/m(3)). The exposure levels were also highly variable, depending on various extra bedding materials applied. Plant materials, particularly straw, utilized for bedding appeared to be a significant source for β(1 → 3)-glucan. Compost was significantly associated with elevated exposure levels. Between-worker variances of exposure were highly explained by determinants of exposure like type of bedding materials and milking by robot, whereas determinants could explain to lesser extent the within-worker variances. Exposure levels to endotoxin, β(1 → 3)-glucan, bacteria, and fungi in dairy barns were substantial and differed depending on bedding materials, suggesting bedding material types as a significant predictor of bio-aerosol exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22549719     DOI: 10.1038/jes.2012.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1559-0631            Impact factor:   5.563


  10 in total

Review 1.  A comprehensive review of levels and determinants of personal exposure to dust and endotoxin in livestock farming.

Authors:  Ioannis Basinas; Torben Sigsgaard; Hans Kromhout; Dick Heederik; Inge M Wouters; Vivi Schlünssen
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.563

2.  Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.

Authors:  Hamza Mbareche; Marc Veillette; Guillaume J Bilodeau; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Characterization of inhalable endotoxin, glucan, and dust exposures in Iowa farmers.

Authors:  Jean-François Sauvé; Sarah J Locke; Pabitra R Josse; Emma M Stapleton; Nervana Metwali; Ralph W Altmaier; Gabriella Andreotti; Peter S Thorne; Jonathan N Hofmann; Laura E Beane Freeman; Melissa C Friesen
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 5.840

4.  Particulate matter, endotoxin, and worker respiratory health on large Californian dairies.

Authors:  Diane C Mitchell; Tracey L Armitage; Marc B Schenker; Deborah H Bennett; Daniel J Tancredi; Chelsea Eastman Langer; Stephen J Reynolds; Greg Dooley; John Mehaffy; Frank M Mitloehner
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.306

5.  Size, Composition, and Source Profiles of Inhalable Bioaerosols from Colorado Dairies.

Authors:  Joshua W Schaeffer; Stephen Reynolds; Sheryl Magzamen; Amanda VanDyke; Neil R Gottel; Jack A Gilbert; Sarah M Owens; Jarrad T Hampton-Marcell; John Volckens
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 11.357

6.  Associations Between Bioaerosol Exposures and Lung Function Changes Among Dairy Workers in Colorado.

Authors:  Sheena E Martenies; Joshua W Schaeffer; Grant Erlandson; Mary Bradford; Jill A Poole; Ander Wilson; Zachary Weller; Stephen J Reynolds; Sheryl Magzamen
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.306

7.  Concentrations of Aerosol Numbers and Airborne Bacteria, and Temperature and Relative Humidity, and Their Interrelationships in a Tie-Stall Dairy Barn.

Authors:  Md Aminul Islam; Atsuo Ikeguchi; Takanori Naide
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-24       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Upper and lower respiratory airway complaints among female veterinary staff.

Authors:  F Hoffmeyer; A Beine; A Lotz; O Kleinmüller; C Nöllenheidt; E Zahradnik; A Nienhaus; M Raulf
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Assessment of Indoor Air Quality for Group-Housed Macaques (Macaca spp.).

Authors:  Annemiek Maaskant; Isabel Janssen; Inge M Wouters; Frank J C M van Eerdenburg; Edmond J Remarque; Jan A M Langermans; Jaco Bakker
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.231

10.  Evaluation of the Physical Properties of Bedding Materials for Dairy Cattle Using Fuzzy Clustering Analysis.

Authors:  Patrícia Ferreira Ponciano Ferraz; Gabriel Araújo E Silva Ferraz; Lorenzo Leso; Marija Klopčič; Giuseppe Rossi; Matteo Barbari
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 2.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.