Literature DB >> 22548730

Psychosocial work environment and prediction of quality of care indicators in one Canadian health center.

Maxime Paquet1, François Courcy, Mélanie Lavoie-Tremblay, Serge Gagnon, Stéphanie Maillet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies link organizational variables and outcomes to quality indicators. This approach would expose operant mechanisms by which work environment characteristics and organizational outcomes affect clinical effectiveness, safety, and quality indicators. QUESTION: What are the predominant psychosocial variables in the explanation of organizational outcomes and quality indicators (in this case, medication errors and length of stay)? The primary objective of this study was to link the fields of evidence-based practice to the field of decision making, by providing an effective model of intervention to improve safety and quality.
METHODS: The study involved healthcare workers (n = 243) from 13 different care units of a university affiliated health center in Canada. Data regarding the psychosocial work environment (10 work climate scales, effort/reward imbalance, and social support) was linked to organizational outcomes (absenteeism, turnover, overtime), to the nurse/patient ratio and quality indicators (medication errors and length of stay) using path analyses.
RESULTS: The models produced in this study revealed a contribution of some psychosocial factors to quality indicators, through an indirect effect of personnel- or human resources-related variables, more precisely: turnover, absenteeism, overtime, and nurse/patient ratio. Four perceptions of work environment appear to play an important part in the indirect effect on both medication errors and length of stay: apparent social support from supervisors, appreciation of the workload demands, pride in being part of one's work team, and effort/reward balance.
CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals the importance of employee perceptions of the work environment as an indirect predictor of quality of care. Working to improve these perceptions is a good investment for loyalty and attendance. In general, better personnel conditions lead to fewer medication errors and shorter length of stay. © Sigma Theta Tau International.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22548730     DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2012.00250.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs        ISSN: 1545-102X            Impact factor:   2.931


  4 in total

1.  Work stress, burnout, and perceived quality of care: a cross-sectional study among hospital pediatricians.

Authors:  M Weigl; A Schneider; F Hoffmann; P Angerer
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Linking Transformational Leadership with Nurse-Assessed Adverse Patient Outcomes and the Quality of Care: Assessing the Role of Job Satisfaction and Structural Empowerment.

Authors:  Muhammad Asif; Arif Jameel; Abid Hussain; Jinsoo Hwang; Noman Sahito
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  How psychosocial factors affect well-being of practice assistants at work in general medical care?--a questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Katja Goetz; Sarah Berger; Amina Gavartina; Stavria Zaroti; Joachim Szecsenyi
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Acute care nurses' perceptions of leadership, teamwork, turnover intention and patient safety - a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Shahram Zaheer; Liane Ginsburg; Hannah J Wong; Kelly Thomson; Lorna Bain; Zaev Wulffhart
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2021-07-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.