Literature DB >> 2254848

Differential construal and the false consensus effect.

T Gilovich1.   

Abstract

People's own beliefs, values, and habits tend to bias their perceptions of how widely they are shared. The present research examined whether this "false consensus effect" is partly due to people's failure to recognize that their choices are not solely a function of the "objective" response alternatives, but of their subjective construal of those alternatives. Study 1 provided initial support for the importance of differential construal in people's consensus estimates by showing that larger false consensus effects tend to be obtained on items that permit the most latitude for subjective construal. Study 2 replicated this effect experimentally by asking Ss either a general or specific version of the same question. Larger false consensus effects were obtained on the general version that offered more latitude for construal. Studies 3 & 4 provided further support by showing that (a) Ss who made different choices tended to interpret the response alternatives in ways that reflected the choices they made and (b) subjects who were led to construe the alternatives in the same way tended to make the same choices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2254848     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.59.4.623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  7 in total

1.  Ripple effects in memory: judgments of moral blame can distort memory for events.

Authors:  David A Pizarro; Cara Laney; Erin K Morris; Elizabeth F Loftus
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

2.  The influence of network mortality experience on nonnumeric response concerning expected family size: evidence from a Nepalese mountain village.

Authors:  John Sandberg
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2005-11

3.  Moral hypocrisy on the basis of construal level: to be a utilitarian personal decision maker or to be a moral advisor?

Authors:  Wei Xiao; Qing Wu; Qun Yang; Liang Zhou; Yuan Jiang; Jiaxi Zhang; Danmin Miao; Jiaxi Peng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Do we know others' visual liking?

Authors:  Ryosuke Niimi; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2014-11-20

5.  A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy.

Authors:  Andrea Polonioli
Journal:  Synthese       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.908

6.  Humans judge faces in incomplete photographs as physically more attractive.

Authors:  Diana Orghian; César A Hidalgo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Is social projection based on simulation or theory? Why new methods are needed for differentiating.

Authors:  Claudia Bazinger; Anton Kühberger
Journal:  New Ideas Psychol       Date:  2012-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.