Salvatore Timineri1, Massimiliano Mulè, Euglena Puzzangara, Gloria Santangelo, Daniela Dugo, Vincenzo Schillaci, Angelo Di Grazia, Caudio Liotta, Salvatore Scandura, Donatella Tempio, Corrado Tamburino, Valeria Calvi.
Abstract
AIMS: About 30 to 50% of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may not show clinical or echocardiographic improvement, despite fulfilling guidelines recommendations for CRT. For this reason, we need a more accurate method to assess CRT eligibility. The aims of this study were to verify, on a 12-month follow-up, the usefulness of QT corrected dispersion (QTcD) in a patient's selection for CRT.
METHODS: We stratified 53 patients who underwent CRT, into two groups based on the estimation of QTcD, that is, QTcD > 60 ms and QTcD ≤ 60 ms. In all patients were performed New York Heart Association (NYHA) class determination, six-minute walking test, QtcD, and QRS measurements, and complete echocardiographic assessment at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after implantation.
RESULTS: At baseline, there were no significant differences in clinical, echocardiographic, and electrocardiographic parameters duration between two groups. At 12-month follow-up between the two groups, there were significant differences in NYHA (1.2 ± 0.4 vs 2 ± 0.6; P < 0.01), six-minute walking distance (422 ± 68 vs 364 ± 68; P < 0.01), left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (34 ± 7% vs 28 ± 6%; P < 0.01), LV end-diastolic diameter (57 ± 7 vs 63 ± 8; P < 0.01), and LV intraventricular dyssynchrony (24 ± 14 vs 39 ± 23; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that QTc dispersion in addition to QRS duration could improve the sensitivity of electrocardiogram in a patient's selection for CRT. ©2012, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
AIMS: About 30 to 50% of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may not show clinical or echocardiographic improvement, despite fulfilling guidelines recommendations for CRT. For this reason, we need a more accurate method to assess CRT eligibility. The aims of this study were to verify, on a 12-month follow-up, the usefulness of QT corrected dispersion (QTcD) in a patient's selection for CRT.
METHODS: We stratified 53 patients who underwent CRT, into two groups based on the estimation of QTcD, that is, QTcD > 60 ms and QTcD ≤ 60 ms. In all patients were performed New York Heart Association (NYHA) class determination, six-minute walking test, QtcD, and QRS measurements, and complete echocardiographic assessment at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after implantation.
RESULTS: At baseline, there were no significant differences in clinical, echocardiographic, and electrocardiographic parameters duration between two groups. At 12-month follow-up between the two groups, there were significant differences in NYHA (1.2 ± 0.4 vs 2 ± 0.6; P < 0.01), six-minute walking distance (422 ± 68 vs 364 ± 68; P < 0.01), left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (34 ± 7% vs 28 ± 6%; P < 0.01), LV end-diastolic diameter (57 ± 7 vs 63 ± 8; P < 0.01), and LV intraventricular dyssynchrony (24 ± 14 vs 39 ± 23; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that QTc dispersion in addition to QRS duration could improve the sensitivity of electrocardiogram in a patient's selection for CRT. ©2012, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Entities:
Mesh：
Year: 2012
PMID： 22548384 DOI： 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03402.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ISSN： 0147-8389 Impact factor: 1.976