| Literature DB >> 22547993 |
Agata Tarkowska1, Wanda Furmaga-Jabłońska.
Abstract
Heart diseases are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in newborns. Diagnostic methods are often not sufficient or, in many cases, cannot be used. There is a great advance in medical knowledge concerning biomarkers in the diagnosis of circulatory system in adult patients. Among them, cardiac troponins play the main role. In current literature, there is not enough data concerning the possibility of using them in neonatal cardiac diagnostics. Aim of the Study. To evaluate diagnostic usefulness of cTnT in correlation with other markers of circulatory failure and myocardial damage in newborns with heart defects. Patients and Methods. The study involved 83 newborns up to 46 weeks of postmenstrual age. The exclusion criteria were severe perinatal asphyxia and presence of severe noncardiac diseases. Patients were divided into 2 main groups: group I-54 patients with congenital heart defects (CHDs), and group II (control)-29 healthy neonates. All patients underwent detailed examination of circulatory system. Cardiac troponin T (cTnT) concentrations were evaluated by Roche CARDIAC T Quantitive test. Results. Performed studies revealed that cTnT levels in newborns with heart pathology were significantly higher than in healthy ones. However, cTnT concentrations in patients with CHD did not correlate with clinical symptoms of heart failure, nor with echocardiographic markers of LV function. Type of heart defect did not influence cTnT levels as well. Only hemodynamic significance evaluated by echocardiography influenced the cTnT levels with statistical significance. Conclusions. (1) Statistically significant differences in cTnT levels between newborns with heart defects and healthy subjects were shown. (2) CTnT levels in newborns with heart defects refer only to hemodynamic significance of the defect.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22547993 PMCID: PMC3324289 DOI: 10.1100/2012/682538
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Characteristic of heart defects in group I patients.
| Division of heart defects Group I ( | Type of defect | Number of patients | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hemodynamic significant defects ( | Simple shunts ( | ASD + VSD | 10 |
| ASD + VSD + PDA | 2 | ||
| ASD + PDA | 2 | ||
| PDA | 1 | ||
| ASD | 1 | ||
| Combined heart defects ( | CAVC | 5 | |
| FT4 | 2 | ||
| PS + ASD | 1 | ||
| CoA + ASD | 1 | ||
| TA | 1 | ||
| L-TGA +VSD + PS | 1 | ||
| DORV + ASD | 1 | ||
| SA + PS + ASD + PDA | 1 | ||
| Defects without hemodynamic significance ( | Simple shunts ( | ASD | 11 |
| ASD + PDA | 7 | ||
| ASD + VSD | 4 | ||
| ASD + VSD + PDA | 2 | ||
| Combined heart defects ( | PS + ASD | 1 | |
N: number of patients
ASD: atrial septum defect
VSD: ventricular septum defect
PDA: persistent ductus arteriosus
CoA: aortic coarctation
PS: pulmonary stenosis
DORV: double outlet left ventricle
TA: truncus arteriosus
TGA: transposition of great arteries
SA: aortic stenosis.
Comparison of clinical signs of heart failure evaluated by the Rosse's heart failure in infants classification in studied groups.
| Group | Class | Number of patients | |
|---|---|---|---|
| I ( | Ii ( | I | 22 |
| II | 2 | ||
| III | 2 | ||
| IV | 3 | ||
| In ( | I | 25 | |
| II ( | I | 49 | |
Comparison of clinical signs of heart failure evaluated with the Reithmann's pediatric heart failure score.
| Group | Score (points) | Number of patients | |
|---|---|---|---|
| I ( | Ii ( | 0–2 | 24 |
| 3–6 | 2 | ||
| >6 | 3 | ||
| In ( | 0–2 | 25 | |
| II ( | 0–2 | 49 | |
Figure 1Number of patients with particular cTnT concentration ranges in studied groups.
Number of patients with particular cTnT concentration ranges in studied groups.
| cTnT (ng/mL) | Newborns with heart defects group I ( | Control group group II ( | Statistical significance |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 20 | 6 |
|
| 0, 03–0, 1 | 24 | 22 | |
| 0, 1–2, 0 | 10 | 1 |
N: number of patients.
Troponin T concentration categories in dependence of heart defect hemodynamic significance.
| Hemodynamic significance group I ( | Statistical significance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| TnT (ng/mL) | Significant (group Ii) | Not significant(group In) | |
|
| 7 | 13 |
|
| 0,03–0,1 | 14 | 10 | |
| 0,1–2,0 | 8 | 2 | |
N: number of patients.