Literature DB >> 2254777

Interobserver variation in histopathological grading of cervical dysplasia.

H C de Vet1, P G Knipschild, H J Schouten, J Koudstaal, W S Kwee, D Willebrand, F Sturmans, J W Arends.   

Abstract

In order to assess the variability among histopathologists in grading cervical dysplasia, four experienced histopathologists examined the same set of 106 biopsy specimens and assigned them to one of five diagnostic categories. These were: no dysplasia, mild dysplasia, moderate dysplasia, severe dysplasia and carcinoma in situ. The histopathologists did not discuss the grading criteria beforehand. There was considerable disagreement among the pathologists: unweighted group kappa 0.28, weighted group kappa 0.56. It appeared that all grades of dysplasia were equally difficult to distinguish from adjacent categories. Various explanations for this interobserver variation are put forward.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2254777     DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90107-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  15 in total

1.  The contribution of MIB 1 in the accurate grading of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  M van Beurden; A J de Craen; H C de Vet; J L Blaauwgeers; P Drillenburg; M P Gallee; N W de Kraker; F B Lammes; F J ten Kate
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  How can we develop a cost-effective quality cervical screening programme?

Authors:  Sue Wilson; Helen Lester
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Novel dual-function CellDetect® staining technology: wedding morphology and tinctorial discrimination to detect cervical neoplasia.

Authors:  Pavel Idelevich; Adi Elkeles; Elimelech Okon; Don Kristt; Dov Terkieltaub; Ilia Rivkin; Ilan Bruchim; Ami Fishman
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.644

4.  Relation between sampling device and detection of abnormality in cervical smears: a meta-analysis of randomised and quasi-randomised studies.

Authors:  F Buntinx; M Brouwers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-23

Review 5.  [Modern biomarkers for precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix : Histological-cytological correlation and use].

Authors:  D Schmidt
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.011

6.  Interobserver variation in the reporting of the histopathological grading of anal intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  P S Carter; J P Sheffield; N Shepherd; D H Melcher; D Jenkins; P Ewings; I Talbot; J M Northover
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  A comparison of cervical histopathology variability using whole slide digitized images versus glass slides: experience with a statewide registry.

Authors:  Julia C Gage; Nancy Joste; Brigette M Ronnett; Mark Stoler; William C Hunt; Mark Schiffman; Cosette M Wheeler
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  Cervical histopathology variability among laboratories: a population-based statewide investigation.

Authors:  Julia C Gage; Mark Schiffman; William C Hunt; Nancy Joste; Arpita Ghosh; Nicolas Wentzensen; Cosette M Wheeler
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.493

9.  Low false-negative rate of PCR analysis for detecting human papillomavirus-related cervical lesions.

Authors:  P Zazove; B D Reed; L Gregoire; A Ferenczy; D W Gorenflo; W D Lancaster
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and the incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade III.

Authors:  I T Gram; M Macaluso; J Churchill; H Stalsberg
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.