Literature DB >> 22547719

Outcomes of endodontic therapy in general practice: a study by the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning Network.

Susan D Bernstein1, Allan J Horowitz, Martin Man, Hongyu Wu, Denise Foran, Donald A Vena, Damon Collie, Abigail G Matthews, Frederick A Curro, Van P Thompson, Ronald G Craig.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors undertook a study involving members of a dental practice-based research network to determine the outcome and factors associated with success and failure of endodontic therapy.
METHODS: Members in participating practices (practitioner-investigators [P-Is]) invited the enrollment of all patients seeking treatment in the practice who had undergone primary endodontic therapy and restoration in a permanent tooth three to five years previously. If a patient had more than one tooth so treated, the P-I selected as the index tooth the tooth treated earliest during the three- to five-year period. The authors excluded from the study any teeth that served as abutments for removable partial dentures or overdentures, third molars and teeth undergoing active orthodontic endodontic therapy. The primary outcome was retention of the index tooth. Secondary outcomes, in addition to extraction, that defined failure included clinical or radiographic evidence (or both) of periapical pathosis, endodontic retreatment or pain on percussion.
RESULTS: P-Is in 64 network practices enrolled 1,312 patients with a mean (standard deviation) time to follow-up of 3.9 (0.6) years. During that period, 3.3 percent of the index teeth were extracted, 2.2 percent underwent retreatment, 3.6 percent had pain on percussion and 10.6 percent had periapical radiolucencies for a combined failure rate of 19.1 percent. The presence of preoperative periapical radiolucency with a diagnosis of either irreversible pulpitis or necrotic pulp was associated with failure after multivariate analysis, as were multiple canals, male sex and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that failure rates for endodontic therapy are higher than previously reported in general practices, according to results of studies based on dental insurance claims data. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The results of this study can help guide the practitioner in deciding the most appropriate course of therapy for teeth with irreversible pulpitis, necrotic pulp or periapical periodontitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22547719      PMCID: PMC4394182          DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8177            Impact factor:   3.634


  23 in total

1.  The National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research: research for the practicing dentist.

Authors:  Bruce L Pihlstrom; Lawrence Tabak
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.634

2.  An epidemiologic study of tooth retention after nonsurgical endodontic treatment in a large population in Taiwan.

Authors:  Shih-Chung Chen; Ling-Huey Chueh; Chuhsing Kate Hsiao; Miao-Yu Tsai; Shih-Chang Ho; Chun-Pin Chiang
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 3.  Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature - part 1. Effects of study characteristics on probability of success.

Authors:  Y-L Ng; V Mann; S Rahbaran; J Lewsey; K Gulabivala
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 5.264

Review 4.  Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature -- Part 2. Influence of clinical factors.

Authors:  Y-L Ng; V Mann; S Rahbaran; J Lewsey; K Gulabivala
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 5.264

5.  Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto Study. Phase III: initial treatment.

Authors:  Vincent L Marquis; Thuan Dao; Mahsa Farzaneh; Sarah Abitbol; Shimon Friedman
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.171

6.  Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study--phase 4: initial treatment.

Authors:  Cristian de Chevigny; Thuan T Dao; Bettina R Basrani; Vincent Marquis; Mahsa Farzaneh; Sarah Abitbol; Shimon Friedman
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 4.171

7.  Comparison of success of implants versus endodontically treated teeth.

Authors:  James Porter Hannahan; Paul Duncan Eleazer
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 8.  Limitations of previously published systematic reviews evaluating the outcome of endodontic treatment.

Authors:  M-K Wu; H Shemesh; P R Wesselink
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 5.264

9.  Outcomes of root canal treatment in Dental Practice-Based Research Network practices.

Authors:  Gregg H Gilbert; Ken R Tilashalski; Mark S Litaker; Sandre F McNeal; Michael J Boykin; Allen W Kessler
Journal:  Gen Dent       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb

Review 10.  Outcomes of root canal treatment and restoration, implant-supported single crowns, fixed partial dentures, and extraction without replacement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mahmoud Torabinejad; Patricia Anderson; Jim Bader; L Jackson Brown; Lie H Chen; Charles J Goodacre; Mathew T Kattadiyil; Diana Kutsenko; Jaime Lozada; Rishi Patel; Floyd Petersen; Israel Puterman; Shane N White
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.426

View more
  9 in total

1.  Outcomes of implants and restorations placed in general dental practices: a retrospective study by the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning (PEARL) Network.

Authors:  John D Da Silva; Julie Kazimiroff; Athena Papas; Frederick A Curro; Van P Thompson; Donald A Vena; Hongyu Wu; Damon Collie; Ronald G Craig
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.634

2.  Periodontal diagnosis affected by variation in terminology.

Authors:  John A Martin; Ashley C Grill; Abigail G Matthews; Don Vena; Van P Thompson; Ronald G Craig; Frederick A Curro
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 6.993

3.  Restorative outcomes for endodontically treated teeth in the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning network.

Authors:  Howard Spielman; Scott B Schaffer; Mitchell G Cohen; Hongyu Wu; Donald A Vena; Damon Collie; Frederick A Curro; Van P Thompson; Ronald G Craig
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.634

4.  Root Canal Treatment Survival Analysis in National Dental PBRN Practices.

Authors:  T Thyvalikakath; M LaPradd; Z Siddiqui; W D Duncan; G Eckert; J K Medam; D B Rindal; M Jurkovich; G H Gilbert
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 8.924

5.  SHED aggregate exosomes shuttled miR-26a promote angiogenesis in pulp regeneration via TGF-β/SMAD2/3 signalling.

Authors:  Meiling Wu; Xuemei Liu; Zihan Li; Xiaoyao Huang; Hao Guo; Xiaohe Guo; Xiaoxue Yang; Bei Li; Kun Xuan; Yan Jin
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 6.831

6.  Outcome of Initial Endodontic Treatment Performed, by One Specialist, in 122 Tunisian Patients: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Latifa Berrezouga; Adel Bouguezzi; Mohamed Semir Belkhir
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2018-07-30

7.  Retrospective study to identify associations between clinician training and dental implant outcome and to compare the use of MATLAB with SAS.

Authors:  Jyoti Sonkar; Pooja Maney; Qingzhao Yu; Archontia Palaiologou
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2019-08-09

Review 8.  Computerized tomography technique for the investigation of the maxillary first molar mesiobuccal root.

Authors:  Stefano Corbella; Massimo Del Fabbro; Igor Tsesis; Silvio Taschieri
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2013-09-08

9.  A modified efficient method for dental pulp stem cell isolation.

Authors:  Maryam Raoof; Mohammad Mehdi Yaghoobi; Ali Derakhshani; Ali Mohammadi Kamal-Abadi; Behnam Ebrahimi; Mehdi Abbasnejad; Noushin Shokouhinejad
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2014-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.