PURPOSE: Patients with Richter's syndrome (RS) have a poor prognosis with conventional chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome after autologous stem-cell transplantation (autoSCT) or allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (alloSCT) in RS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A survey was sent to all European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation centers assessing transplantations performed for RS. Eligibility criteria included a diagnosis of RS or secondary lymphoma before SCT, age ≥ 18 years, and SCT performed from 1997 to 2007. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and methods from survival analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were registered. Thirty-four patients had received autoSCT, mostly because of chemotherapy-sensitive disease, and 25 had received alloSCT, with 36% being refractory to chemotherapy at SCT. In 18 allograft recipients (72%), reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) was used. Three-year estimates of the probabilities of overall survival and relapse-free survival (RFS) and the cumulative incidences of relapse and nonrelapse mortality were 36%, 27%, 47%, and 26% for alloSCT and 59%, 45%, 43%, and 12% for autoSCT, respectively. Taking into account the limitations set by the low number of events and age younger than 60 years, chemotherapy-sensitive disease and RIC were found to be associated with superior RFS after alloSCT in multivariate analysis. Factors with a significant impact on autoSCT could not be identified. CONCLUSION: Patients with RS who are sensitive to induction chemotherapy appear to benefit from consolidation with transplantation strategies, and prolonged survival was observed in a proportion of patients.
PURPOSE:Patients with Richter's syndrome (RS) have a poor prognosis with conventional chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome after autologous stem-cell transplantation (autoSCT) or allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (alloSCT) in RS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A survey was sent to all European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation centers assessing transplantations performed for RS. Eligibility criteria included a diagnosis of RS or secondary lymphoma before SCT, age ≥ 18 years, and SCT performed from 1997 to 2007. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and methods from survival analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were registered. Thirty-four patients had received autoSCT, mostly because of chemotherapy-sensitive disease, and 25 had received alloSCT, with 36% being refractory to chemotherapy at SCT. In 18 allograft recipients (72%), reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) was used. Three-year estimates of the probabilities of overall survival and relapse-free survival (RFS) and the cumulative incidences of relapse and nonrelapse mortality were 36%, 27%, 47%, and 26% for alloSCT and 59%, 45%, 43%, and 12% for autoSCT, respectively. Taking into account the limitations set by the low number of events and age younger than 60 years, chemotherapy-sensitive disease and RIC were found to be associated with superior RFS after alloSCT in multivariate analysis. Factors with a significant impact on autoSCT could not be identified. CONCLUSION:Patients with RS who are sensitive to induction chemotherapy appear to benefit from consolidation with transplantation strategies, and prolonged survival was observed in a proportion of patients.
Authors: Uri Rozovski; Ohad Benjamini; Preetesh Jain; Philip A Thompson; William G Wierda; Susan O'Brien; Jan A Burger; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Stefan Faderl; Elizabeth Shpall; Chitra Hosing; Issa F Khouri; Richard Champlin; Michael J Keating; Zeev Estrov Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-04-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mazie Tsang; Tait D Shanafelt; Timothy G Call; Wei Ding; Asher Chanan-Khan; Jose F Leis; Grzegorz S Nowakowski; Deborah Bowen; Michael Conte; Susan M Schwager; Susan L Slager; Neil E Kay; Curtis A Hanson; Sameer A Parikh Journal: Blood Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Niels Smedegaard Andersen; Martin Bornhäuser; Martin Gramatzki; Peter Dreger; Antonin Vitek; Michal Karas; Mauricette Michallet; Carol Moreno; Michel van Gelder; Anja Henseler; Liesbeth C de Wreede; Stefan Schönland; Nicolaus Kröger; Johannes Schetelig Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2019-08-29 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Lorenzo Falchi; Michael J Keating; Edith M Marom; Mylene T Truong; Ellen J Schlette; Rachel L Sargent; Long Trinh; Xuemei Wang; Susan C Smith; Nitin Jain; Zeev Estrov; Susan O'Brien; William G Wierda; Susan Lerner; Alessandra Ferrajoli Journal: Blood Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Andrew D Zelenetz; Leo I Gordon; William G Wierda; Jeremy S Abramson; Ranjana H Advani; C Babis Andreadis; Nancy Bartlett; John C Byrd; Myron S Czuczman; Luis E Fayad; Richard I Fisher; Martha J Glenn; Thomas M Habermann; Nancy Lee Harris; Richard T Hoppe; Steven M Horwitz; Christopher R Kelsey; Youn H Kim; Susan Krivacic; Ann S LaCasce; Auayporn Nademanee; Pierluigi Porcu; Oliver Press; Rachel Rabinovitch; Nishitha Reddy; Erin Reid; Ayman A Saad; Lubomir Sokol; Lode J Swinnen; Christina Tsien; Julie M Vose; Lynn Wilson; Joachim Yahalom; Nadeem Zafar; Mary Dwyer; Hema Sundar Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Peter Dreger; Johannes Schetelig; Niels Andersen; Paolo Corradini; Michel van Gelder; John Gribben; Eva Kimby; Mauricette Michallet; Carol Moreno; Stephan Stilgenbauer; Emili Montserrat Journal: Blood Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Sameer A Parikh; Kari G Rabe; Timothy G Call; Clive S Zent; Thomas M Habermann; Wei Ding; Jose F Leis; Susan M Schwager; Curtis A Hanson; William R Macon; Neil E Kay; Susan L Slager; Tait D Shanafelt Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2013-07-11 Impact factor: 6.998