Literature DB >> 22545947

Sex differences in the spatial representation of number.

Rebecca Bull1, Alexandra A Cleland2, Thomas Mitchell2.   

Abstract

There is a large body of accumulated evidence from behavioral and neuroimaging studies regarding how and where in the brain we represent basic numerical information. A number of these studies have considered how numerical representations may differ between individuals according to their age or level of mathematical ability, but one issue rarely considered is whether the representational acuity or automaticity of using numerical representations differs between the sexes. We report 4 studies that suggest that male participants show a stronger influence of the spatial representation of number as revealed through the spatial numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect, through the numerical distance effect (NDE), and through number-line estimations. Evidence for a sex difference in processing number was present for parity decisions (Experiment 1), color decisions (Experiment 2), number-line estimations (Experiment 3), and magnitude decisions (Experiment 4). We argue that this pattern of results reflects a sex difference in either the acuity of representation or reliance upon spatial representations of number, and that this difference may arise due to differences in the parietal lobes of men and women. 2013 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22545947     DOI: 10.1037/a0028387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  20 in total

1.  Operational momentum for magnitude ordering in preschool children and adults.

Authors:  Hannah Dunn; Nicky Bernstein; Maria Dolores de Hevia; Viola Macchi Cassia; Hermann Bulf; Koleen McCrink
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2018-12-15

2.  Embodied markedness of parity? Examining handedness effects on parity judgments.

Authors:  Stefan Huber; Elise Klein; Martina Graf; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Korbinian Moeller; Klaus Willmes
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-11-14

3.  The impact of inhibition capacities and age on number-space associations.

Authors:  Danielle Hoffmann; Delia Pigat; Christine Schiltz
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-01-19

4.  Individual differences influence two-digit number processing, but not their analog magnitude processing: a large-scale online study.

Authors:  Stefan Huber; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Ulf-Dietrich Reips; Mojtaba Soltanlou
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-12-23

5.  Time dependency of the SNARC effect for different number formats: evidence from saccadic responses.

Authors:  Alexandra Pressigout; Agnès Charvillat; Karima Mersad; Karine Doré-Mazars
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-04-09

6.  Beginnings of place value: how preschoolers write three-digit numbers.

Authors:  Lisa Byrge; Linda B Smith; Kelly S Mix
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2013-09-04

7.  Chubby hands or little fingers: sex differences in hand representation.

Authors:  Lara A Coelho; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-04-03

8.  The cognitive mechanisms of the SNARC effect: an individual differences approach.

Authors:  Arnaud Viarouge; Edward M Hubbard; Bruce D McCandliss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The impact of mathematical proficiency on the number-space association.

Authors:  Danielle Hoffmann; Christophe Mussolin; Romain Martin; Christine Schiltz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The impact of symbolic and non-symbolic quantity on spatial learning.

Authors:  Koleen McCrink; Jennifer Galamba
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.