Literature DB >> 22544901

Multi-centre diagnostic classification of individual structural neuroimaging scans from patients with major depressive disorder.

Benson Mwangi1, Klaus P Ebmeier, Keith Matthews, J Douglas Steele.   

Abstract

Quantitative abnormalities of brain structure in patients with major depressive disorder have been reported at a group level for decades. However, these structural differences appear subtle in comparison with conventional radiologically defined abnormalities, with considerable inter-subject variability. Consequently, it has not been possible to readily identify scans from patients with major depressive disorder at an individual level. Recently, machine learning techniques such as relevance vector machines and support vector machines have been applied to predictive classification of individual scans with variable success. Here we describe a novel hybrid method, which combines machine learning with feature selection and characterization, with the latter aimed at maximizing the accuracy of machine learning prediction. The method was tested using a multi-centre dataset of T(1)-weighted 'structural' scans. A total of 62 patients with major depressive disorder and matched controls were recruited from referred secondary care clinical populations in Aberdeen and Edinburgh, UK. The generalization ability and predictive accuracy of the classifiers was tested using data left out of the training process. High prediction accuracy was achieved (~90%). While feature selection was important for maximizing high predictive accuracy with machine learning, feature characterization contributed only a modest improvement to relevance vector machine-based prediction (~5%). Notably, while the only information provided for training the classifiers was T(1)-weighted scans plus a categorical label (major depressive disorder versus controls), both relevance vector machine and support vector machine 'weighting factors' (used for making predictions) correlated strongly with subjective ratings of illness severity. These results indicate that machine learning techniques have the potential to inform clinical practice and research, as they can make accurate predictions about brain scan data from individual subjects. Furthermore, machine learning weighting factors may reflect an objective biomarker of major depressive disorder illness severity, based on abnormalities of brain structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22544901     DOI: 10.1093/brain/aws084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  67 in total

Review 1.  A review of feature reduction techniques in neuroimaging.

Authors:  Benson Mwangi; Tian Siva Tian; Jair C Soares
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2014-04

2.  A machine learning framework involving EEG-based functional connectivity to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD).

Authors:  Wajid Mumtaz; Syed Saad Azhar Ali; Mohd Azhar Mohd Yasin; Aamir Saeed Malik
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Neuroimaging in Psychiatry and Neurodevelopment: why the emperor has no clothes.

Authors:  Ashley N Anderson; Jace B King; Jeffrey S Anderson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Treatment-naïve first episode depression classification based on high-order brain functional network.

Authors:  Yanting Zheng; Xiaobo Chen; Danian Li; Yujie Liu; Xin Tan; Yi Liang; Han Zhang; Shijun Qiu; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.839

5.  Development and evaluation of a multimodal marker of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Mengru Zhang; Hongshik Ahn; Qing Zhang; Tony B Jin; Ien Li; Matthew Nemesure; Nandita Joshi; Haoran Jiang; Jeffrey M Miller; Robert Todd Ogden; Eva Petkova; Matthew S Milak; Mary Elizabeth Sublette; Gregory M Sullivan; Madhukar H Trivedi; Myrna Weissman; Patrick J McGrath; Maurizio Fava; Benji T Kurian; Diego A Pizzagalli; Crystal M Cooper; Melvin McInnis; Maria A Oquendo; Joseph John Mann; Ramin V Parsey; Christine DeLorenzo
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Psychiatric disorders: diagnosis to therapy.

Authors:  John H Krystal; Matthew W State
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  [Neuroimaging in psychiatry: multivariate analysis techniques for diagnosis and prognosis].

Authors:  J Kambeitz; N Koutsouleris
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 8.  Annual research review: Current limitations and future directions in MRI studies of child- and adult-onset developmental psychopathologies.

Authors:  Guillermo Horga; Tejal Kaur; Bradley S Peterson
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 8.982

9.  Brainstem abnormalities in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder support high accuracy individual diagnostic classification.

Authors:  Blair A Johnston; Benson Mwangi; Keith Matthews; David Coghill; Kerstin Konrad; J Douglas Steele
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Unsupervised classification of major depression using functional connectivity MRI.

Authors:  Ling-Li Zeng; Hui Shen; Li Liu; Dewen Hu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.