OBJECTIVES: To compare mesoscopic epi-fluorescence tomography (MEFT) and EPRI-illumination reflectance imaging (EPRI) for quantitative tumour size assessment in mice. METHODS: Tumour xenografts of green/red fluorescent protein (GFP/RFP)-expressing colon cancer cells were measured using MEFT, EPRI, ultrasound (US) and micro computed tomography (μCT) at day 14 post-injection (n = 6). Results from MEFT and EPRI were correlated with each other and with US and μCT (reference methods). Tumour volumes were measured ex vivo by GFP and RFP fluorescence imaging on cryoslices and compared with the in vivo measurements. RESULTS: High correlation and congruency were observed between MEFT, US and μCT (MEFT/US: GFP: r (2) = 0.96; RFP: r (2) = 0.97, both P < 0.05; MEFT/μCT: GFP: r (2) = 0.93; RFP: r (2) = 0.90; both P < 0.05). Additionally, in vivo MEFT data were highly correlated and congruent with ex vivo cryoslice imaging results (GFP: r (2) = 0.96; RFP: r (2) = 0.99; both P < 0.05). In comparison, EPRI significantly overestimated tumour volumes (P < 0.05), although there was a significant correlation with US and μCT (EPRI/US: GFP: r (2) = 0.95; RFP: r (2) = 0.94; both P < 0.05; EPRI/μCT GFP: r (2) = 0.86; RFP: r (2) = 0.86; both P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Fluorescence distribution reconstruction using MEFT affords highly accurate three-dimensional (3D) tumour volume data showing superior accuracy compared to EPRI. Thus, MEFT is a very suitable technique for quantitatively assessing fluorescence distribution in superficial tumours at high spatial resolution.
OBJECTIVES: To compare mesoscopic epi-fluorescence tomography (MEFT) and EPRI-illumination reflectance imaging (EPRI) for quantitative tumour size assessment in mice. METHODS:Tumour xenografts of green/red fluorescent protein (GFP/RFP)-expressing colon cancer cells were measured using MEFT, EPRI, ultrasound (US) and micro computed tomography (μCT) at day 14 post-injection (n = 6). Results from MEFT and EPRI were correlated with each other and with US and μCT (reference methods). Tumour volumes were measured ex vivo by GFP and RFP fluorescence imaging on cryoslices and compared with the in vivo measurements. RESULTS: High correlation and congruency were observed between MEFT, US and μCT (MEFT/US: GFP: r (2) = 0.96; RFP: r (2) = 0.97, both P < 0.05; MEFT/μCT: GFP: r (2) = 0.93; RFP: r (2) = 0.90; both P < 0.05). Additionally, in vivo MEFT data were highly correlated and congruent with ex vivo cryoslice imaging results (GFP: r (2) = 0.96; RFP: r (2) = 0.99; both P < 0.05). In comparison, EPRI significantly overestimated tumour volumes (P < 0.05), although there was a significant correlation with US and μCT (EPRI/US: GFP: r (2) = 0.95; RFP: r (2) = 0.94; both P < 0.05; EPRI/μCT GFP: r (2) = 0.86; RFP: r (2) = 0.86; both P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Fluorescence distribution reconstruction using MEFT affords highly accurate three-dimensional (3D) tumour volume data showing superior accuracy compared to EPRI. Thus, MEFT is a very suitable technique for quantitatively assessing fluorescence distribution in superficial tumours at high spatial resolution.
Authors: Alison M Y Cheung; Allison S Brown; Lauren A Hastie; Viviene Cucevic; Marcia Roy; James C Lacefield; Aaron Fenster; F Stuart Foster Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Nikolaos C Deliolanis; Thomas Wurdinger; Lisa Pike; Bakhos A Tannous; Xandra O Breakefield; Ralph Weissleder; Vasilis Ntziachristos Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2011-03-16 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Mehmet S Ozturk; Chao-Wei Chen; Robin Ji; Lingling Zhao; Bao-Ngoc B Nguyen; John P Fisher; Yu Chen; Xavier Intes Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2015-12-08 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: R Pflanzer; M Hofmann; A Shelke; A Habib; W Derwich; T Schmitz-Rixen; A Bernd; R Kaufmann; J Bereiter-Hahn Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 4.243