OBJECT: Cytoplasmic lipid droplets (LDs) are dynamic cellular organelles; their accumulation is associated with several cellular processes, such as cell proliferation, apoptosis and necrosis. (1)H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy detects resonances from lipids present in cytoplasmic (LDs); an understanding of the relationship between LD characteristics and NMR lipid signals is important. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, five nervous system cancer cell lines were investigated. Nile red staining was used to measure the diameter of LDs. High-resolution magic angle spinning NMR (HR-MAS) was performed on harvested cell pellets to quantify the patterns of lipid signals. RESULTS: LDs were present in all five cell lines with different morphology. An average LD diameter of approximately 0.2 μm was found in all cell types. Diameter of the largest LDs varied across the cell lines. The intensity of NMR lipid signals varied greatly between cell types, and a good correlation was found between total volume of LDs and the proton NMR lipid signal intensity at 0.9 and 1.3 ppm. CONCLUSION: The correlation implied that little NMR signal is detected from LDs of diameters less than approximately 0.34 μm, most likely due to restriction of rotational motion of the lipids.
OBJECT: Cytoplasmic lipid droplets (LDs) are dynamic cellular organelles; their accumulation is associated with several cellular processes, such as cell proliferation, apoptosis and necrosis. (1)H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy detects resonances from lipids present in cytoplasmic (LDs); an understanding of the relationship between LD characteristics and NMR lipid signals is important. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, five nervous system cancer cell lines were investigated. Nile red staining was used to measure the diameter of LDs. High-resolution magic angle spinning NMR (HR-MAS) was performed on harvested cell pellets to quantify the patterns of lipid signals. RESULTS: LDs were present in all five cell lines with different morphology. An average LD diameter of approximately 0.2 μm was found in all cell types. Diameter of the largest LDs varied across the cell lines. The intensity of NMR lipid signals varied greatly between cell types, and a good correlation was found between total volume of LDs and the proton NMR lipid signal intensity at 0.9 and 1.3 ppm. CONCLUSION: The correlation implied that little NMR signal is detected from LDs of diameters less than approximately 0.34 μm, most likely due to restriction of rotational motion of the lipids.
Authors: Andrew S Greenberg; Rosalind A Coleman; Fredric B Kraemer; James L McManaman; Martin S Obin; Vishwajeet Puri; Qing-Wu Yan; Hideaki Miyoshi; Douglas G Mashek Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2011-06-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Daniel Valverde-Saubí; Ana Paula Candiota; Maria Antònia Molins; Miguel Feliz; Oscar Godino; Myriam Dávila; Juan José Acebes; Carles Arús Journal: MAGMA Date: 2010-06-13 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: C Rémy; N Fouilhé; I Barba; E Sam-Laï; H Lahrech; M G Cucurella; M Izquierdo; A Moreno; A Ziegler; R Massarelli; M Décorps; C Arús Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1997-02-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Yolanda Pérez; Hana Lahrech; Miquel E Cabañas; Ramon Barnadas; Manel Sabés; Chantal Rémy; Carles Arús Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2002-10-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: M Di Vito; L Lenti; A Knijn; E Iorio; F D'Agostino; A Molinari; A Calcabrini; A Stringaro; S Meschini; G Arancia; A Bozzi; R Strom; F Podo Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2001-01-15
Authors: Maria T Accioly; Patricia Pacheco; Clarissa M Maya-Monteiro; Nina Carrossini; Bruno K Robbs; Silvia S Oliveira; Cristiane Kaufmann; José A Morgado-Diaz; Patricia T Bozza; João P B Viola Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-03-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Eva Kaebisch; Taylor L Fuss; Lindsey A Vandergrift; Karin Toews; Piet Habbel; Leo L Cheng Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2017-03-16 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Christopher D Bennett; Simrandip K Gill; Sarah E Kohe; Martin P Wilson; Nigel P Davies; Theodoros N Arvanitis; Daniel A Tennant; Andrew C Peet Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-07-19 Impact factor: 4.379