Literature DB >> 22543338

Review of a 13-year single-center experience with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass as the primary surgical treatment of coronary artery disease.

David M Holzhey1, Jan P Cornely, Ardawan J Rastan, Piroze Davierwala, Friedrich W Mohr.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: In this study, we review our experience with 1768 minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) operations. The focus is on long-term outcome with more than 10 years of follow-up.
METHODS: All patients undergoing standard MIDCAB between 1996 and 2009 were included. For all 1768 patients, pre-, intra-, and postoperative data could be completed. Long-term follow-up information about health status, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), and freedom from angina was collected annually via questionnaire or personal contact. Five-year follow-up is available for 1313 patients, and 10-year-follow-up is available for 748 patients. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors for long-term outcome.
RESULTS: Mean age was 63.4 ± 10.8 years, mean ejection fraction was 60.0% ± 14.2%, and perioperative mortality risk calculated by logistic EuroSCORE was 3.8 ± 6.2%. In 31 patients (1.75%) intraoperative conversion to sternotomy was necessary. Early postoperative mortality was 0.8% (15 patients); 0.4% (7 patients) had a perioperative stroke. Seven hundred twelve patients received routine postoperative angiogram, showing 95.5% early graft patency. Short-term target vessel reintervention was needed in 59 patients (3.3%) (11 percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)/stent, 48 re-operation). Kaplan-Meyer analysis revealed a 5-year survival rate of 88.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86.6% to 89.9%) and a 10-year-survival rate of 76.6% (95% CI, 73.5% to 78.7%). The freedom from MACCE and angina after 5 and 10 years was 85.3% (95% CI, 83.5% to 87.1%) and 70.9% (95% CI, 68.1% to 73.7%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: MIDCAB is a safe operation with low postoperative mortality and morbidity. With excellent short-term and long-term results, it is a very good alternative compared to both percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and conventional surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22543338     DOI: 10.1532/HSF98.20111141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Surg Forum        ISSN: 1098-3511            Impact factor:   0.676


  10 in total

1.  Why is the mammary artery so special and what protects it from atherosclerosis?

Authors:  Fumiyuki Otsuka; Kazuyuki Yahagi; Kenichi Sakakura; Renu Virmani
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07

2.  Past, present, and future of minimal access cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Shahzad G Raja; Mohamed Amrani
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  A review of hybrid coronary revascularization.

Authors:  Michael Owen Kayatta; Michael Emanuel Halkos
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-11-19

Review 4.  Strategies for the coronary surgeon to remain "competitive and co-operative" in the PCI era.

Authors:  George Jose Valooran; Shiv Kumar Nair; Krishnan Chandrasekharan
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2015-07-08

5.  Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass in a child with an occlusion of left main coronary artery after arterial switch operation.

Authors:  Jill Jussli-Melchers; Assad Haneya; Grischa Hoffmann; Jochen Cremer
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-08-28

6.  The Likert scale is a powerful tool for quality of life assessment among patients after minimally invasive coronary surgery.

Authors:  Łukasz J Krzych; Małgorzata Lach; Michał Joniec; Marek Cisowski; Andrzej Bochenek
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2018-06-25

7.  Minimally invasive coronary artery surgery: Robotic and nonrobotic minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass techniques.

Authors:  Mateo Marin-Cuartas; Michel Pompeu Sá; Gianluca Torregrossa; Piroze M Davierwala
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-10-13

Review 8.  LIMA to LAD grafting returns patient survival to age-matched population: 20-year outcomes of MIDCAB surgery.

Authors:  Lucy Manuel; Laura S Fong; Kim Betts; Levi Bassin; Hugh Wolfenden
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-09-09

9.  Short-term clinical outcomes and long-term survival of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Shahzad G Raja; Sheena Garg; Melissa Rochon; Siobhan Daley; Fabio De Robertis; Toufan Bahrami
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-09

Review 10.  Minimally Invasive Coronary Revascularisation Surgery: A Focused Review of the Available Literature.

Authors:  Karel M Van Praet; Markus Kofler; Timo Z Nazari Shafti; Alaa Abd El Al; Antonia van Kampen; Andrea Amabile; Gianluca Torregrossa; Jörg Kempfert; Volkmar Falk; Husam H Balkhy; Stephan Jacobs
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.