OBJECTIVE: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) spreads intra-abdominally and to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes. A greater number of distant metastases are revealed by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) compared to conventional imaging methods. We aimed to investigate the presence and anatomic distribution of supradiaphragmatic lymph node metastasis (LNM) detected with pretreatment FDG PET/CT. METHODS: Thirty women with advanced stage (IIC-IV) EOC were scanned with whole body contrast-enhanced FDG PET/CT prior to surgery/neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We performed PET/CT analysis qualitatively and quantitatively. Additionally, contrast-enhanced CT was analyzed blinded to PET/CT scan. Intra-abdominal dissemination was verified by surgery and histopathology. Metabolically active lymph nodes were biopsied when possible. The clinical characteristics of patients with and without supradiaphragmatic LNM were compared. RESULTS: In 20/30 patients (67%) FDG PET/CT detected supradiaphragmatic LNM in one or more locations, whereas conventional CT found LNM in 10 patients (33%). Fourteen patients had parasternal, 14 cardiophrenic, 8 other mediastinal, 6 axillar, and 1 subclavian LNM. Microscopy of all four biopsied lymph nodes (three axillar and one subclavian) confirmed metastatic dissemination. The patients with supradiaphragmatic LNM had significantly more ascites (p<0.01), higher CA 125 levels, and more frequent subdiaphragmal carcinomatosis (p<0.03) compared to patients without supradiaphragmatic LNM in preoperative FDG PET/CT. CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of patients with advanced EOC showed supradiaphragmatic LNM in pre-treatment PET/CT. Our findings suggest that the route of EOC cells from the peritoneal cavity to the lymphatic system permeates the diaphragm mainly to the cardiophrenic and continues to parasternal lymph nodes.
OBJECTIVE:Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) spreads intra-abdominally and to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes. A greater number of distant metastases are revealed by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) compared to conventional imaging methods. We aimed to investigate the presence and anatomic distribution of supradiaphragmatic lymph node metastasis (LNM) detected with pretreatment FDG PET/CT. METHODS: Thirty women with advanced stage (IIC-IV) EOC were scanned with whole body contrast-enhanced FDG PET/CT prior to surgery/neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We performed PET/CT analysis qualitatively and quantitatively. Additionally, contrast-enhanced CT was analyzed blinded to PET/CT scan. Intra-abdominal dissemination was verified by surgery and histopathology. Metabolically active lymph nodes were biopsied when possible. The clinical characteristics of patients with and without supradiaphragmatic LNM were compared. RESULTS: In 20/30 patients (67%) FDG PET/CT detected supradiaphragmatic LNM in one or more locations, whereas conventional CT found LNM in 10 patients (33%). Fourteen patients had parasternal, 14 cardiophrenic, 8 other mediastinal, 6 axillar, and 1 subclavian LNM. Microscopy of all four biopsied lymph nodes (three axillar and one subclavian) confirmed metastatic dissemination. The patients with supradiaphragmatic LNM had significantly more ascites (p<0.01), higher CA 125 levels, and more frequent subdiaphragmal carcinomatosis (p<0.03) compared to patients without supradiaphragmatic LNM in preoperative FDG PET/CT. CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of patients with advanced EOC showed supradiaphragmatic LNM in pre-treatment PET/CT. Our findings suggest that the route of EOC cells from the peritoneal cavity to the lymphatic system permeates the diaphragm mainly to the cardiophrenic and continues to parasternal lymph nodes.
Authors: Marcelo A Queiroz; Rahel A Kubik-Huch; Nik Hauser; Bianka Freiwald-Chilla; Gustav von Schulthess; Johannes M Froehlich; Patrick Veit-Haibach Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-05-29 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Elizabeth A Sadowski; Atul B Shinagare; Hyesun Park; Olga R Brook; Rosemarie Forstner; Sumer K Wallace; Jeanne M Horowitz; Neil Horowitz; Marcia Javitt; Priyanka Jha; Aki Kido; Yulia Lakhman; Susanna I Lee; Lucia Manganaro; Katherine E Maturen; Stephanie Nougaret; Liina Poder; Gaiane M Rauch; Caroline Reinhold; Evis Sala; Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara; Herbert Alberto Vargas; Aradhana Venkatesan; Olivera Nikolic; Andrea G Rockall Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2021-11-30 Impact factor: 7.034
Authors: Katrijn Michielsen; Ignace Vergote; Katya Op de Beeck; Frederic Amant; Karin Leunen; Philippe Moerman; Christophe Deroose; Geert Souverijns; Steven Dymarkowski; Frederik De Keyzer; Vincent Vandecaveye Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Roberto C Delgado Bolton; Nicolas Aide; Patrick M Colletti; Annamaria Ferrero; Diana Paez; Andrea Skanjeti; Francesco Giammarile Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-07-03 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Tuulia Vallius; Johanna Hynninen; Jukka Kemppainen; Victor Alves; Kari Auranen; Jaakko Matomäki; Sinikka Oksa; Johanna Virtanen; Seija Grénman; Annika Auranen; Marko Seppänen Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-02-23 Impact factor: 9.236