BACKGROUND: A bias to selectively direct attention to threat stimuli is a cognitive characteristic of anxiety disorders. Recent studies indicate that individual differences in pre-treatment threat attention bias predict treatment outcomes from cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) in anxious individuals. However, there have been inconsistent findings regarding whether attention bias towards threat predicts better or poorer treatment outcome. METHOD: This longitudinal study examined treatment outcomes in 35 clinically-anxious children following a 10-week, group-based CBT program, as a function of whether children showed a pre-treatment attention bias towards or away from threat stimuli. The effect of CBT on attention bias was also assessed. RESULTS: Both groups showed significant improvement after receiving CBT. However, anxious children with a pre-treatment attention bias towards threat showed greater reductions not only in anxiety symptom severity, but also in the likelihood of meeting diagnostic criteria for anxiety disorders at post-treatment assessment, in comparison with anxious children who showed a pre-treatment attention bias away from threat. Children who had a pre-treatment bias away from threat showed a reduction in this bias over the course of CBT. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that pre-existing differences in the direction of attention towards versus away from threat could have important implications for the treatment of anxious children.
BACKGROUND: A bias to selectively direct attention to threat stimuli is a cognitive characteristic of anxiety disorders. Recent studies indicate that individual differences in pre-treatment threat attention bias predict treatment outcomes from cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) in anxious individuals. However, there have been inconsistent findings regarding whether attention bias towards threat predicts better or poorer treatment outcome. METHOD: This longitudinal study examined treatment outcomes in 35 clinically-anxious children following a 10-week, group-based CBT program, as a function of whether children showed a pre-treatment attention bias towards or away from threat stimuli. The effect of CBT on attention bias was also assessed. RESULTS: Both groups showed significant improvement after receiving CBT. However, anxious children with a pre-treatment attention bias towards threat showed greater reductions not only in anxiety symptom severity, but also in the likelihood of meeting diagnostic criteria for anxiety disorders at post-treatment assessment, in comparison with anxious children who showed a pre-treatment attention bias away from threat. Children who had a pre-treatment bias away from threat showed a reduction in this bias over the course of CBT. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that pre-existing differences in the direction of attention towards versus away from threat could have important implications for the treatment of anxious children.
Authors: Dana Rosen; Rebecca B Price; Cecile D Ladouceur; Greg J Siegle; Emily Hutchinson; Eric E Nelson; Laura R Stroud; Erika E Forbes; Neal D Ryan; Ronald E Dahl; Jennifer S Silk Journal: Child Psychiatry Hum Dev Date: 2019-12
Authors: Rebecca E Hommer; Allison Meyer; Joel Stoddard; Megan E Connolly; Karin Mogg; Brendan P Bradley; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft; Melissa A Brotman Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2013-06-24 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Allison M Waters; Steven G Candy; Melanie J Zimmer-Gembeck; Trisha A Groth; Michelle G Craske; Brendan P Bradley; Karin Mogg Journal: J Abnorm Child Psychol Date: 2019-11
Authors: Katie L Burkhouse; Autumn Kujawa; Heide Klumpp; Kate D Fitzgerald; Christopher S Monk; K Luan Phan Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2016-11-08 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Rebecca B Price; Dana Rosen; Greg J Siegle; Cecile D Ladouceur; Kevin Tang; Kristy Benoit Allen; Neal D Ryan; Ronald E Dahl; Erika E Forbes; Jennifer S Silk Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2015-11-23
Authors: Tomer Shechner; Adi Rimon-Chakir; Jennifer C Britton; Danny Lotan; Alan Apter; Paul D Bliese; Daniel S Pine; Yair Bar-Haim Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 8.829