Literature DB >> 22542366

Effects of the etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant inserted immediately postpartum on maternal hemostasis: a randomized controlled trial.

Milena B Brito1, Rui A Ferriani, Joost C M Meijers, Andréa A Garcia, Silvana M Quintana, Marcos F Silva de Sá, Carolina S Vieira.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The puerperium is the period of highest risk for thrombosis during a woman's reproductive life and it is an important time for initiating an effective contraceptive method in order to increase intergestational interval. Thus, the objective of the present study was to evaluated the effects of the etonogestrel (ENG)-releasing contraceptive implant inserted immediately postpartum on maternal hemostasis markers during the first six weeks of delivery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty healthy women aged 18 to 35 years-old were randomized to receive either the ENG-releasing implant 24-48 h after delivery (implant group; n=20) or nothing (control group) until the sixth postpartum week. Blood samples were collected at 24-48 h and at 6 weeks after delivery, and hemostatic variables, including fibrinogen, coagulation factors, protein C, free protein S, antithrombin, α2-antiplasmin, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), prothrombin fragment (PF)1+2, and D-dimers, as well as normalized activated protein C sensitivity ratio (nAPCsr), thrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and prothrombin time were evaluated.
RESULTS: Insertion of the ENG-releasing contraceptive implant did not change the physiological reduction in overall coagulation (TAT and PF1+2) and fibrinolysis (D-dimer) markers, or nAPCsr. Reductions in factors II, VII, X and fibrinogen and increases in factor V were greater in the control than in the implant group. Clotting factors remained within normal limits throughout the study.
CONCLUSION: The ENG-releasing contraceptive implant inserted immediately postpartum did not have negative effects on physiological variations of the hemostatic system during the first 6 weeks postpartum.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22542366     DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.03.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  3 in total

1.  The Use of ACOG Guidelines: Perceived Contraindications to IUD and Implant Use Among Family Planning Providers.

Authors:  Ash E Philliber; Heather Hirsch; Claire D Brindis; Rita Turner; Susan Philliber
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-09

Review 2.  Immediate versus delayed postpartum insertion of contraceptive implant for contraception.

Authors:  Jen Sothornwit; Yuthapong Werawatakul; Srinaree Kaewrudee; Pisake Lumbiganon; Malinee Laopaiboon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-22

Review 3.  Safety and Benefits of Contraceptives Implants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Morena Luigia Rocca; Anna Rita Palumbo; Federica Visconti; Costantino Di Carlo
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.