Literature DB >> 22542347

Comparison of the five 2011 guidelines for the treatment of carotid stenosis.

Kosmas I Paraskevas1, Dimitri P Mikhailidis, Frank J Veith.   

Abstract

In 2011, five independent, international guideline committees reported their recommendations for the management of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. These included the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, the Society for Vascular Surgery, the European Society of Cardiology, the Australasian, and the UK National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence. As the recommendations of these five guideline committees were based on the same published literature, it would be expected that they are similar, at least to a large extent. Surprisingly, there were considerable differences between the five guidelines regarding the management of both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid patients. The differences in the recommendations between the five Guideline Committees are analyzed and discussed.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22542347     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.01.084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  13 in total

1.  Clinical practice guidelines and the overuse of health care services: need for reform.

Authors:  Ismail Jatoi; Sunita Sah
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  [Choosing wisely recommendations in angiology].

Authors:  O J Müller; R Sternitzky
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 0.743

3.  Risk prediction for adverse events after carotid artery stenting in higher surgical risk patients.

Authors:  Neil J Wimmer; Robert W Yeh; Donald E Cutlip; Laura Mauri
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Safety and efficacy of simultaneous bilateral carotid angioplasty and stenting.

Authors:  Yongkun Li; Wenshan Sun; Qin Yin; Yinzhou Wang; Qiankun Cai; Wen Sun; Zhixin Huang; Wenhua Liu; Yunyun Xiong; Gelin Xu; Xinfeng Liu
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in the US Medicare Population, 1999-2014.

Authors:  Judith H Lichtman; Michael R Jones; Erica C Leifheit; Alice J Sheffet; George Howard; Brajesh K Lal; Virginia J Howard; Yun Wang; Jeptha Curtis; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Apolipoprotein J as a predictive biomarker for restenosis after carotid endarterectomy: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Anastasios Maskanakis; Nikolaos Patelis; Georgios Karaolanis; Spyridon Davakis; Dimitrios Schizas; Despina Perrea; Chris Klonaris; Sotirios Georgopoulos; Theodoros Liakakos; Chris Bakoyiannis
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 7.  Evidence for management of carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Kazumichi Yoshida; Susumu Miyamoto
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  Atherosclerotic plaque component segmentation in combined carotid MRI and CTA data incorporating class label uncertainty.

Authors:  Arna van Engelen; Wiro J Niessen; Stefan Klein; Harald C Groen; Hence J M Verhagen; Jolanda J Wentzel; Aad van der Lugt; Marleen de Bruijne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Carotid revascularization: risks and benefits.

Authors:  Marlene O'Brien; Ankur Chandra
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2014-07-07

10.  Successful treatment of suprasellar tumors associated with poor brain blood perfusion by severe intracranial arterial stenosis: two case reports.

Authors:  Yoshikazu Ogawa; Teiji Tominaga
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.