Literature DB >> 22542140

Peak oxygen uptake during cardiopulmonary exercise testing determines response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Satish Arora1, Marit Aarones, Svend Aakhus, Rita Skaardal, Halfdan Aass, Pål Aukrust, Erik Kongsgaard, Lars Gullestad.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment modality for advanced heart failure (HF) but 20-30% of patients treated with CRT do not experience clinical improvement. Hence, in this study we aimed to investigate whether baseline cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) can help improve the prediction of a positive functional CRT response.
METHODS: This prospective observational study included 76 HF patients undergoing elective CRT implantation and clinical CPX and echocardiographic assessment were performed at baseline, 6, and 12 months.
RESULTS: Peak VO2 increased from 11.0±2.5 ml/min/kg to 12.0±4.1 ml/min/kg and 12.2±3.5 ml/min/kg at 6 and 12 months after CRT, respectively. The number of patients classified as "CRT-responders" (Δ peak VO2≥1 ml/kg/min) was 33 (46%) and 36 (52%) at 6 and 12 months after CRT, respectively. Patients with baseline peak VO2<40% of predicted (lowest tertile) demonstrated a 68% and 69% response rate at 6 and 12 months, respectively, as compared to a 35% and 42% response rate among patients with baseline peak VO2≥40% of predicted (p=0.01 and p=0.02, respectively). In multivariate analysis patients with baseline peak VO2<40% of predicted had an adjusted odds ratio of 4.4 (95% CI 1.6-12.5; p<0.01) and 3.1 (95% CI 1.1-8.8; p=0.03) for positive CRT response at 6 and 12 months, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with CRT improves exercise capacity but this increase is most substantial among patients with a lower baseline peak VO2 (% of predicted). Baseline CPX can, therefore, be utilized to identify patients more likely to exhibit a functional improvement after CRT.
Copyright © 2012 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22542140     DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2012.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiol        ISSN: 0914-5087            Impact factor:   3.159


  2 in total

1.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Assessment of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Programming Strategies.

Authors:  Xu Gao; Mohamad Abdi; Daniel A Auger; Changyu Sun; Christopher A Hanson; Austin A Robinson; Christopher Schumann; Pim J Oomen; Sarah Ratcliffe; Rohit Malhotra; Andrew Darby; Oliver J Monfredi; J Michael Mangrum; Pamela Mason; Sula Mazimba; Jeffrey W Holmes; Christopher M Kramer; Frederick H Epstein; Michael Salerno; Kenneth C Bilchick
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-08-18

2.  Cardiac magnetic resonance defines mechanisms of sex-based differences in outcomes following cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Derek J Bivona; Srikar Tallavajhala; Mohamad Abdi; Pim J A Oomen; Xu Gao; Rohit Malhotra; Andrew Darby; Oliver J Monfredi; J Michael Mangrum; Pamela Mason; Sula Mazimba; Michael Salerno; Christopher M Kramer; Frederick H Epstein; Jeffrey W Holmes; Kenneth C Bilchick
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.