Literature DB >> 22541942

Computational models for wall shear stress estimation in scaffolds: a comparative study of two complete geometries.

F Maes1, T Claessens, M Moesen, H Van Oosterwyck, P Van Ransbeeck, P Verdonck.   

Abstract

Fluid mechanical stimuli are known to upregulate cell differentiation and matrix formation. Since wall shear stress plays an important role various studies tried to estimate the scaffold fluid dynamic environment. However, because of the geometrical complexity, nearly all studies created their CFD model based on a submodel of the entire scaffold assuming that the model covers heterogeneity sufficiently. However to the authors' knowledge no study exist providing guidelines in this matter. In a previous study we demonstrated that submodels are influenced by the boundary conditions, inevitable when flow channels are chopped off. For the current study we therefore developed μCT based models of two complete scaffold geometries (one titanium and one hydroxyapatite). Imposing a 0.04 ml/min flow rate resulted in a surface area averaged wall shear stress of 1.41 mPa for titanium and 1.09 mPa for hydroxyapatite. In order to get insight in required model size we subdivided the domain in regions of different size. From our results we propose a model size between 6 and 10 times the average pore size. The wall shears stress should be calculated on a region at least one pore size away from the boundaries. These guidelines could be of use for computationally more costly simulations where it is not possible to simulate the complete scaffold domain.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22541942     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  5 in total

1.  Flow velocity-driven differentiation of human mesenchymal stromal cells in silk fibroin scaffolds: A combined experimental and computational approach.

Authors:  Jolanda Rita Vetsch; Duncan Colin Betts; Ralph Müller; Sandra Hofmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Biofabrication offers future hope for tackling various obstacles and challenges in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: A Perspective.

Authors:  Tanveer Ahmad Mir; Shintaroh Iwanaga; Taketoshi Kurooka; Hideki Toda; Shinji Sakai; Makoto Nakamura
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2018-12-31

3.  Osteochondral tissue coculture: An in vitro and in silico approach.

Authors:  Ruikang Xue; Benedict Chung; Maryam Tamaddon; James Carr; Chaozong Liu; Sarah Harriet Cartmell
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  A multiscale computational fluid dynamics approach to simulate the micro-fluidic environment within a tissue engineering scaffold with highly irregular pore geometry.

Authors:  Feihu Zhao; Johanna Melke; Keita Ito; Bert van Rietbergen; Sandra Hofmann
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2019-06-14

Review 5.  Strategy for achieving standardized bone models.

Authors:  Mikhael Hadida; David Marchat
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 4.530

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.