Literature DB >> 22541787

Evaluation of BACTEC Plus aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles and BacT/Alert FAN aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles for the detection of bacteremia in ICU patients.

Kyoung Ho Roh1, Ju Yeon Kim, Ha Nui Kim, Hye Jin Lee, Jang Wook Sohn, Min Ja Kim, Yunjung Cho, Young Kee Kim, Chang Kyu Lee.   

Abstract

Blood culture is the most valuable laboratory test for the diagnosis of bacteremia and sepsis. The BACTEC FX and BacT/Alert 3D automated blood culture systems are commonly used in Korean health care facilities. A controlled clinical evaluation of the resin-containing BACTEC Plus aerobic (BA) and anaerobic (BN), and the charcoal-containing FAN aerobic (FA) and anaerobic (FN) bottles using blood from intensive care unit (ICU) patients was designed. The performances of these 2 systems with media containing particle absorbing antimicrobial agents were evaluated using the culture positivity rate and time to detection (TTD). TTD was collected using data management systems, either the Epicenter (BD Diagnostic Systems) or the hospital laboratory information system. A total of 1539 four-bottle sets were collected from 270 patients in medical and surgical ICUs. Blood culture samples included 1539 bottles each of BA, BN, FA, and FN, and yielded 113 (7.3%), 90 (5.8%), 104 (6.8%), and 80 (5.2%) positive bacterial or fungal isolates, respectively. There were significant differences between the resin-containing BA and BN samples in culture positivity and also between the charcoal-containing FA and FN samples, especially for Escherichia coli (25/27 versus 17/27, P < 0.05) and Acinetobacter baumannii (14/15 versus 7/15, P < 0.05). Significantly shorter recovery time was observed in BACTEC Plus aerobic bottles than in FAN aerobic bottles (17.2 and 24.7 h, respectively) (P < 0.001).
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22541787     DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  9 in total

1.  Performance of Gram staining on blood cultures flagged negative by an automated blood culture system.

Authors:  A Peretz; N Isakovich; N Pastukh; A Koifman; T Glyatman; D Brodsky
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  A comparative evaluation of BACT/ALERT FA PLUS and FN PLUS blood culture bottles and BD BACTEC Plus Aerobic and Anaerobic blood culture bottles for antimicrobial neutralization.

Authors:  Yousun Chung; In-Hee Kim; Minje Han; Hyun Soo Kim; Han-Sung Kim; Wonkeun Song; Jae-Seok Kim
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Antimicrobial binding and growth kinetics in BacT/ALERT® FA Plus and BACTEC® Aerobic/F Plus blood culture media.

Authors:  D Lovern; B Katzin; K Johnson; D Broadwell; E Miller; A Gates; P Deol; K Doing; A van Belkum; C Marshall; E Mathias; W M Dunne
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Comparison of BacT/Alert FAN and FAN Plus Bottles with Conventional Medium for Culturing Cerebrospinal Fluid.

Authors:  In Young Yoo; Sejong Chun; Dong Joon Song; Hee Jae Huh; Nam Yong Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Performance of two resin-containing blood culture media in detection of bloodstream infections and in direct matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) broth assays for isolate identification: clinical comparison of the BacT/Alert Plus and Bactec Plus systems.

Authors:  Barbara Fiori; Tiziana D'Inzeo; Viviana Di Florio; Flavio De Maio; Giulia De Angelis; Alessia Giaquinto; Lara Campana; Eloisa Tanzarella; Mario Tumbarello; Massimo Antonelli; Maurizio Sanguinetti; Teresa Spanu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Clinical evaluation of BacT/Alert FA plus and FN plus bottles compared with standard bottles.

Authors:  Dong-Hyun Lee; Seong Chun Kim; In-Gyu Bae; Eun-Ha Koh; Sunjoo Kim
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Superior sensitivity and decreased time to detection with the Bactec Peds Plus/F system compared to the BacT/Alert Pediatric FAN blood culture system.

Authors:  K V Sullivan; N N Turner; D P Lancaster; A R Shah; L J Chandler; D F Friedman; D L Blecker-Shelly
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of the Performance of Three Blood Culture Systems in a Chinese Tertiary-Care Hospital.

Authors:  Guanlin Li; Jingjing Sun; Shoucheng Pan; Wenti Li; Shijie Zhang; Yongfeng Wang; Xiaoxu Sun; Hui Xu; Liang Ming
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 5.293

9.  Simulated Pediatric Blood Cultures to Assess the Inactivation of Clinically Relevant Antimicrobial Drug Concentrations in Resin-Containing Bottles.

Authors:  Liliana Giordano; Flora Marzia Liotti; Giulia Menchinelli; Giulia De Angelis; Tiziana D'Inzeo; Grazia Angela Morandotti; Maurizio Sanguinetti; Teresa Spanu; Brunella Posteraro
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 5.293

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.