Literature DB >> 22541357

Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Elizabeth Wager1, Sabine Kleinert.   

Abstract

Institutions and journals both have important duties relating to research and publication misconduct. Institutions are responsible for the conduct of their researchers and for encouraging a healthy research environment. Journals are responsible for the conduct of their editors, for safeguarding the research record, and for ensuring the reliability of everything they publish. It is therefore important for institutions and journals to communicate and collaborate effectively on cases relating to research integrity. To achieve this, we make the following recommendations. Institutions should: • have a research integrity officer (or office) and publish their contact details prominently; • inform journals about cases of proven misconduct that affect the reliability or attribution of work that they have published; • respond to journals if they request information about issues, such as disputed authorship, misleading reporting, competing interests, or other factors, including honest errors, that could affect the reliability of published work; • initiate inquiries into allegations of research misconduct or unacceptable publication practice raised by journals; • have policies supporting responsible research conduct and systems in place for investigating suspected research misconduct. Journals should: • publish the contact details of their editor-in-chief who should act as the point of contact for questions relating to research and publication integrity; • inform institutions if they suspect misconduct by their researchers, and provide evidence to support these concerns; • cooperate with investigations and respond to institutions' questions about misconduct allegations; • be prepared to issue retractions or corrections (according to the COPE guidelines on retractions) when provided with findings of misconduct arising from investigations; • have policies for responding to institutions and other organizations that investigate cases of research misconduct.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22541357     DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maturitas        ISSN: 0378-5122            Impact factor:   4.342


  11 in total

1.  Build infrastructure in publishing scientific journals to benefit medical scientists.

Authors:  Ni Dai; Dingyao Xu; Xiyao Zhong; Li Li; Qibo Ling; Zhaode Bu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 2.  Ethical publishing in intensive care medicine: A narrative review.

Authors:  Christian J Wiedermann
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-08-04

3.  Authorship and contributorship in scholarly journals.

Authors:  Armen Yuri Gasparyan
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  How should journal editors respond to cases of suspected misconduct?

Authors:  Elizabeth Wager
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2014-12-15

5.  How journals and institutions can work together to promote responsible conduct.

Authors:  Eric C Mah
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2014-12-15

6.  How to Verify Plagiarism of the Paper Written in Macedonian and Translated in Foreign Language?

Authors:  Mirko Spiroski
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-29

Review 7.  Publish or Perish mantra in the medical field: A systematic review of the reasons, consequences and remedies.

Authors:  Salman Y Guraya; Robert I Norman; Khalid I Khoshhal; Shaista Salman Guraya; Antonello Forgione
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

8.  Misconduct policies in high-impact biomedical journals.

Authors:  Xavier Bosch; Cristina Hernández; Juan M Pericas; Pamela Doti; Ana Marušić
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  RePAIR consensus guidelines: Responsibilities of Publishers, Agencies, Institutions, and Researchers in protecting the integrity of the research record.

Authors: 
Journal:  Res Integr Peer Rev       Date:  2018-12-19

10.  Awareness, usage and perceptions of authorship guidelines: an international survey of biomedical authors.

Authors:  Sara Schroter; Ilaria Montagni; Elizabeth Loder; M Eikermann; Elke Schäffner; Tobias Kurth
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.