Literature DB >> 22541044

Novel ECG criteria for right ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with right bundle branch block.

Jonathon C Adams1, Matthew R Nelson, Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran, Arshad Jahangir, Komandoor Srivathsan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Altered hemodynamics of a failing right ventricle (RV) may place stress on the right bundle branch and Purkinje network, which may be evident as conduction delay on surface electrocardiogram (ECG). We hypothesized that prolonged R' duration in lead V1 would be an indicator of RV dysfunction in patients with RBBB.
METHODS: The Mayo Clinic Arizona echocardiography database was reviewed from 2007 to 2009 to identify patients with RV dysfunction and coexistent right bundle branch block (RBBB). Specific ECG features of RBBB were compared between the RV dysfunction cohort and a randomly selected control population. Features found to be predictive of RV dysfunction were then tested on 100 consecutive patients with RBBB on ECG between January and June 2010.
RESULTS: In lead V1, the QRS duration was longer in the RV dysfunction cohort (164 ± 22 ms) compared to controls (148 ± 12 ms), predominantly due to R' prolongation (117 ± 27 ms vs. 87 ± 13 ms, p<.001). Retrospective analysis suggested that V1 R' duration ≥ 100 ms may be 82.3% specific for the presence of RV systolic dysfunction. When applied prospectively, V1 R' duration ≥ 100 ms yielded sensitivity and specificity of 39.0% and 82.9% respectively for detection of abnormal RV systolic function with a positive predictive value of 76.7%.
CONCLUSION: Lead V1 R' duration ≥ 100 ms is predictive of RV systolic dysfunction in patients with RBBB.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ECG; Electrocardiography; LR+; LR−; NPV; PPV; RBBB; ROC; RV; Right bundle branch block; Right ventricular dysfunction; SD; TAM; electrocardiogram; mV; millimeters; milliseconds; millivolts; mm; ms; negative likelihood ratio; negative predictive value; positive likelihood ratio; positive predictive value; receiver operating characteristic; right bundle branch block; right ventricle; standard deviation; tricuspid annular motion; years; yrs

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22541044     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.04.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  2 in total

1.  Right ventricular failure predicted from right bundle branch block: cardiac magnetic resonance imaging validation.

Authors:  Santhosh R Devarapally; Sameer Arora; Ali Ahmad; Mike Sood; Amaar El Sergany; Terrence Sacchi; Barry Saul; Rahul Gaglani; John Heitner
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-10

2.  Does surgically induced right bundle branch block really effect ventricular function in children after ventricular septal defect closure?

Authors:  Cem Karadeniz; Semra Atalay; Fikri Demir; Ercan Tutar; Omer Ciftci; Tayfun Ucar; Adnan Uysalel; Zeynep Eyileten
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 1.655

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.