UNLABELLED: What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? The surgical implications of renal cell carcinoma with coexisting bland and tumour thrombi of the inferior vena cava is not well described. In this study we review our experience managing these tumours. On multivariate analysis, we found that the presence of bland thrombus was associated with an increased need for surgical interruption of the inferior vena cava. OBJECTIVE: • To study the role of interruption of the inferior vena cava (IVC) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and associated bland and tumour thrombi. METHODS: • We reviewed 129 consecutive patients with the preoperative diagnosis of RCC with tumour thrombus who underwent radical nephrectomy and tumour thrombectomy in one academic institution between May 1997 and February 2011. RESULTS: • Percentages of patients with levels I, II, III and IV tumour thrombus were 29%, 13%, 48% and 9%, respectively. • The perioperative mortality rate was 2.3%. There were 29 (22%) perioperative complications recorded. • In all, 19 patients underwent surgical interruption of the IVC by ligation or segmental resection, including one level II, 14 level III and four level IV thrombi. • A total of 15 patients (12%) had bland thrombus associated with the tumour thrombus; four of these underwent intraoperative IVC filter placement and eight underwent surgical IVC interruption. • Advanced level of tumour thrombus was the only significant factor predicting association of bland thrombus (odds ratio [OR]= 2.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.082-4.037, P= 0.028). • On multivariate analysis, level of thrombus (OR = 3.1, 95% CI: 1.30-7.74, P= 0.011) and association of bland thrombus (OR = 9.07, 95% CI: 2.42-34.01, P= 0.001) were significant factors for IVC interruption. CONCLUSIONS: • Surgical interruption of the IVC is a feasible option in selected patients with chronic IVC obstruction. Association of bland thrombus with tumour thrombus should alert the surgical team to the potential for a challenging surgery. • Precise preoperative imaging to assess the degree of venous obstruction and to help with differentiation between bland and tumour thrombus is key to achieving a surgical outcome with minimal morbidity.
UNLABELLED: What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? The surgical implications of renal cell carcinoma with coexisting bland and tumour thrombi of the inferior vena cava is not well described. In this study we review our experience managing these tumours. On multivariate analysis, we found that the presence of bland thrombus was associated with an increased need for surgical interruption of the inferior vena cava. OBJECTIVE: • To study the role of interruption of the inferior vena cava (IVC) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and associated bland and tumour thrombi. METHODS: • We reviewed 129 consecutive patients with the preoperative diagnosis of RCC with tumour thrombus who underwent radical nephrectomy and tumour thrombectomy in one academic institution between May 1997 and February 2011. RESULTS: • Percentages of patients with levels I, II, III and IV tumour thrombus were 29%, 13%, 48% and 9%, respectively. • The perioperative mortality rate was 2.3%. There were 29 (22%) perioperative complications recorded. • In all, 19 patients underwent surgical interruption of the IVC by ligation or segmental resection, including one level II, 14 level III and four level IV thrombi. • A total of 15 patients (12%) had bland thrombus associated with the tumour thrombus; four of these underwent intraoperative IVC filter placement and eight underwent surgical IVC interruption. • Advanced level of tumour thrombus was the only significant factor predicting association of bland thrombus (odds ratio [OR]= 2.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.082-4.037, P= 0.028). • On multivariate analysis, level of thrombus (OR = 3.1, 95% CI: 1.30-7.74, P= 0.011) and association of bland thrombus (OR = 9.07, 95% CI: 2.42-34.01, P= 0.001) were significant factors for IVC interruption. CONCLUSIONS: • Surgical interruption of the IVC is a feasible option in selected patients with chronic IVC obstruction. Association of bland thrombus with tumour thrombus should alert the surgical team to the potential for a challenging surgery. • Precise preoperative imaging to assess the degree of venous obstruction and to help with differentiation between bland and tumour thrombus is key to achieving a surgical outcome with minimal morbidity.
Authors: Matthew S Davenport; Eric M Hu; Andrew Zhang; Atul B Shinagare; Andrew D Smith; Ivan Pedrosa; Samuel D Kaffenberger; Stuart G Silverman Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2019-04
Authors: Laura Horodyski; Javier Gonzalez; Marina M Tabbara; Jeffrey J Gaynor; Maria Rodriguez-Cabero; Felipe Herranz-Amo; Carlos Hernández; Rushi Shah; Gaetano Ciancio Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 5.738