AIMS: To assess the value of using in-shoe plantar pressure analysis to improve and preserve the offloading properties of custom-made footwear in patients with diabetes. METHODS: Dynamic in-shoe plantar pressures were measured in new custom-made footwear of 117 patients with diabetes, neuropathy, and a healed plantar foot ulcer. In 85 of these patients, high peak pressure locations (peak pressure > 200 kPa) were targeted for pressure reduction (goal: > 25% relief or below an absolute level of 200 kPa) by modifying the footwear. After each of a maximum three rounds of modifications, pressures were measured. In a subgroup of 32 patients, pressures were measured and, if needed, footwear was modified at 3-monthly visits for 1 year. Pressures were compared with those measured in 32 control patients who had no footwear modifications based on pressure analysis. RESULTS: At the previous ulcer location and the highest and second highest pressure locations, peak pressures were significantly reduced by 23%, 21% and 15%, respectively, after modification of footwear. These lowered pressures were maintained or further reduced over time and were significantly lower, by 24-28%, compared with pressures in the control group. CONCLUSION: The offloading capacity of custom-made footwear for high-risk patients can be effectively improved and preserved using in-shoe plantar pressure analysis as guidance tool for footwear modification. This provides a useful approach to obtain better offloading footwear that may reduce the risk for pressure-related diabetic foot ulcers.
AIMS: To assess the value of using in-shoe plantar pressure analysis to improve and preserve the offloading properties of custom-made footwear in patients with diabetes. METHODS: Dynamic in-shoe plantar pressures were measured in new custom-made footwear of 117 patients with diabetes, neuropathy, and a healed plantar foot ulcer. In 85 of these patients, high peak pressure locations (peak pressure > 200 kPa) were targeted for pressure reduction (goal: > 25% relief or below an absolute level of 200 kPa) by modifying the footwear. After each of a maximum three rounds of modifications, pressures were measured. In a subgroup of 32 patients, pressures were measured and, if needed, footwear was modified at 3-monthly visits for 1 year. Pressures were compared with those measured in 32 control patients who had no footwear modifications based on pressure analysis. RESULTS: At the previous ulcer location and the highest and second highest pressure locations, peak pressures were significantly reduced by 23%, 21% and 15%, respectively, after modification of footwear. These lowered pressures were maintained or further reduced over time and were significantly lower, by 24-28%, compared with pressures in the control group. CONCLUSION: The offloading capacity of custom-made footwear for high-risk patients can be effectively improved and preserved using in-shoe plantar pressure analysis as guidance tool for footwear modification. This provides a useful approach to obtain better offloading footwear that may reduce the risk for pressure-related diabetic foot ulcers.
Authors: Peter A Lazzarini; Ryan T Crews; Jaap J van Netten; Sicco A Bus; Malindu E Fernando; Paul J Chadwick; Bijan Najafi Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2019-04-29
Authors: Stephen J Preece; Jonathan D Chapman; Bjoern Braunstein; Gert-Peter Brüggemann; Christopher J Nester Journal: J Foot Ankle Res Date: 2017-07-06 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Richard Collings; Jennifer A Freeman; Jos Latour; Patricia Jane Vickery; Sam Glasser; Vasileios Lepesis; Doyo Enki; Joanne Paton Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-03-23 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Roelof Waaijman; Renske Keukenkamp; Mirjam de Haart; Wojtek P Polomski; Frans Nollet; Sicco A Bus Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-01-15 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Sicco A Bus; Roelof Waaijman; Mark Arts; Mirjam de Haart; Tessa Busch-Westbroek; Jeff van Baal; Frans Nollet Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Jaap J van Netten; Peter A Lazzarini; David G Armstrong; Sicco A Bus; Robert Fitridge; Keith Harding; Ewan Kinnear; Matthew Malone; Hylton B Menz; Byron M Perrin; Klaas Postema; Jenny Prentice; Karl-Heinz Schott; Paul R Wraight Journal: J Foot Ankle Res Date: 2018-01-15 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Katie E Chatwin; Caroline A Abbott; Andrew J M Boulton; Frank L Bowling; Neil D Reeves Journal: Diabetes Metab Res Rev Date: 2019-12-11 Impact factor: 4.876