Literature DB >> 22540878

Endocervical glandular involvement, positive endocervical surgical margin and multicentricity are more often associated with high-grade than low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.

Gozde Kır1, Murat Hakan Karabulut, Cumhur Selçuk Topal, Müberra Segmen Yılmaz.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the relative frequencies of endocervical glandular involvement (EGI), multicentricity, positive endocervical surgical margins (ESM) and positive vaginal surgical margins (VSM), and adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix (AIS) between high-grade and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL and LSIL, respectively).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We identified 238 patients with squamous intraepithelial lesions/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) who were treated by loop electrocautery excision (LEEP) or conventional cold-knife conization (CKC). A total of 223 (72 [32.3%] LSIL/CIN I; 85 [38.1%] HSIL/CIN II; 66 [29.6%] HSIL/CIN III; and 151 [67.7%], HSIL/CIN II + III) LEEP/CKC slides were histologically reviewed.
RESULTS: The frequencies of EGI, positive ESM, and multicentricity were significantly higher in the HSIL/CIN II + III group than in the LSIL/CIN I group (P = 0.001, 0.001, and 0.025, respectively). Eighteen of the 72 (25%) LSIL/CIN I patients, 44 of the 85 (51.8%) HSIL/CIN II patients, and 60 of the 66 (90.9%) HSIL/CIN III patients (P = 0.001) showed EGI. In four of the 72 (5.6%) LSIL/CIN I patients, 18 of the 85 (21.2%) HSIL/CIN II patients, and 42 of the 66 (63.6%) HSIL/CIN III patients (P = 0.001), ESM was positive. Two of the 72 (2.8%) LSIL/CIN I patients, seven of the 85 (8.2%) HSIL/CIN II patients, and 11 of the 66 (16.7%) HSIL/CIN III patients (P = 0.016) were multicentric.
CONCLUSION: The current study showed that EGI, positive ESM and multicentricity were more often associated with HSIL/CIN II + III than with LSIL/CIN I. Moreover, the frequencies of EGI, multicentricity, and positive ESM increased with increasing severity of the cervical lesion. This result may influence the preference for the type of surgical procedure used for patients with cytological diagnosis of HSIL.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research © 2012 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22540878     DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2012.01847.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res        ISSN: 1341-8076            Impact factor:   1.730


  5 in total

1.  Three-step approach versus see-and-treat approach in patients with cytological abnormalities.

Authors:  Nilgun Guducu; Guliz Sidar; Nuray Bassullu; Ilknur Turkmen; Ilkkan Dunder
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2013-05-22

2.  Clinical Outcomes Associated with Endocervical Glandular Involvement in Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia III.

Authors:  Nae Ry Kim; Zee Hae Baek; A Jin Lee; Eun Jung Yang; Yung-Taek Ouh; Mi Kyung Kim; Seung-Hyuk Shim; Sun Joo Lee; Tae Jin Kim; Kyeong A So
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  The Appropriate of Cone Depth in Loop Electrical Excision Procedure (LEEP) for Negative Pathological Margin from High Grade Precancerous Lesion of Cervix, Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Noppames Srijarusith; Nopporn Rodpenpear
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2022-02-01

4.  The effects of different instruments and suture methods of conization for cervical lesions.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Wang; Lei Li; Yalan Bi; Huanwen Wu; Ming Wu; Jinghe Lang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Oncologic and obstetric outcomes after conization for adenocarcinoma in situ or stage IA1 cervical cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Wang; Yalan Bi; Huanwen Wu; Ming Wu; Lei Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.