Literature DB >> 22540412

Impact of platform switching on inter-proximal bone levels around short implants in the posterior region; 1-year results from a randomized clinical trial.

Gerdien Telleman1, Gerry M Raghoebar, Arjan Vissink, Henny J A Meijer.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the outcome of short implants (8.5 mm) supplied with a conventional platform-matched implant-abutment connection or a platform-switched design.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty patients with one or more missing teeth in the posterior zone were randomly assigned to be treated with implants with either a conventional (control) or a platform-switched (mismatch 0.35-0.40 mm) implant-abutment connection (test). Follow-up visits were conducted 1 month and 1 year after placing the implant crown. Outcome measures were inter-proximal bone loss, using standardized peri-apical radiographs, implant survival, clinical parameters and patients' satisfaction.
RESULTS: One year after loading, inter-proximal bone loss around test implants (0.51 ± 0.51 mm) was significantly less than around control implants (0.73 ± 0.48 mm) (p = 0.011). Moreover, bone loss was less around 1 versus 2 adjacent implants (p = 0.001), in both the test (0.29 ± 0.36 versus 0.71 ± 0.55 mm) and control (0.46 ± 0.42 versus 0.88 ± 0.45 mm) group. With regard to implant survival, clinical parameters and patients' satisfaction no differences were observed between the test and control group.
CONCLUSION: This study suggested that crestal bone resorption may be reduced by platform switching. One year after loading, inter-proximal bone levels were better maintained at implants restored according to the platform switching concept.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22540412     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01887.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  10 in total

Review 1.  Bone level changes around platform switching and platform matching implants: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  M DI Girolamo; R Calcaterra; R DI Gianfilippo; C Arcuri; L Baggi
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-11-13

2.  Posterior partially edentulous jaws, planning a rehabilitation with dental implants.

Authors:  Douglas R Monteiro; Emily V F Silva; Eduardo P Pellizzer; Osvaldo Magro Filho; Marcelo C Goiato
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.337

3.  Analysis of Biomarkers and Marginal Bone Loss in Platform-Switched and Nonplatform-Switched Implants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Necla Asli Kocak-Oztug; Gamze Zeynep Adem-Siyli; Orkhan Abishev; Sule Batu; Yegane Guven; Ali Cekici; Aslan Y Gokbuget; Erhan Firatli; Serdar Cintan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 3.246

4.  Cone beam computed tomographic analyses of alveolar bone anatomy at the maxillary anterior region in Chinese adults.

Authors:  Zhixuan Zhou; Wu Chen; Ming Shen; Chao Sun; Jun Li; Ning Chen
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2013-11-12

5.  Peri-implant tissue alteration around tissue-level and bone-level implants in fresh extraction sockets: a histomorphometric study in dogs.

Authors:  Chunan Zhang; Xu Zhao; Shichong Qiao; Xiaomeng Zhang; Hongchang Lai; Yingxin Gu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-02

Review 6.  Impact of platform switching on marginal peri-implant bone-level changes. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Frank Peter Strietzel; Konrad Neumann; Moritz Hertel
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 5.977

7.  Platform switch versus platform match in the posterior mandible – 1-year results of a multicentre randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Fernando Guerra; Wilfried Wagner; Jörg Wiltfang; Salomão Rocha; Maximilian Moergel; Eleonore Behrens; Pedro Nicolau
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 8.728

8.  Full-zirconia single-tooth molar implant-supported restorations with angulated screw channel abutments: A 1-year prospective case series study.

Authors:  Christiaan W P Pol; Gerry M Raghoebar; Zakelina Maragkou; Marco S Cune; Henny J A Meijer
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.932

9.  Implant-prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with severe horizontal bone deficit on mini-implants with two-piece design-retrospective analysis after a mean follow-up of 5 years.

Authors:  Lukas Wimmer; Pantelis Petrakakis; Karim El-Mahdy; Surian Herrmann; Dirk Nolte
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-07-28

Review 10.  Comparative Study by Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Peri-Implant Effect of Two Types of Platforms: Platform-Switching versus Conventional Platforms.

Authors:  Alejo Juan-Montesinos; Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Maria Fernanda Solá-Ruiz; Rocío Marco-Pitarch; Jose María Montiel-Company; Carla Fons-Badal
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.