Literature DB >> 22539637

Using combined measurements for comparison of light induction of stomatal conductance, electron transport rate and CO2 fixation in woody and fern species adapted to different light regimes.

Shau-Lian Wong1, Chung-Wei Chen, Hsien-Wen Huang, Jen-Hsien Weng.   

Abstract

We aimed to understand the relation of photosynthetic rate (A) with g(s) and electron transport rate (ETR) in species of great taxonomic range and light adaptation capability during photosynthetic light induction. We studied three woody species (Alnus formosana, Ardisia crenata and Ardisia cornudentata) and four fern species (Pyrrosia lingus, Asplenium antiquum, Diplazium donianum and Archangiopteris somai) with different light adaptation capabilities. Pot-grown materials received 100 and/or 10% sunlight according to their light adaptation capabilities. At least 4 months after light acclimation, CO(2) and H(2)O exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence were measured simultaneously by equipment in the laboratory. In plants adapted or acclimated to low light, dark-adapted leaves exposed to 500 or 2000 µmol m(-2) s(-1) photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) for 30 min showed low gross photosynthetic rate (P(g)) and short time required to reach 90% of maximum P(g) (). At the initiation of illumination, two broad-leaved understory shrubs and the four ferns, especially ferns adapted to heavy shade, showed higher stomatal conductance (g(s)) than pioneer tree species; materials with higher g(s) had short at both 500 and 2000 µmol m(-2) s(-1) PPF. With 500 or 2000 µmol m(-2) s(-1) PPF, the g(s) for the three woody species increased from 2 to 30 min after the start of illumination, but little change in the g(s) of the four ferns. Thus, P(g) and g(s) were not correlated for all material measured at the same PPF and induction time. However, P(g) was positively correlated with ETR, even though CO(2) assimilation may be influenced by stomatal, biochemical and photoinhibitory limitations. In addition, was closely related to time required to reach 90% maximal ETR for all materials and with two levels of PPF combined. Thus, ETR is a good indicator for estimating the light induction of photosynthetic rate of species, across a wide taxonomic range and light adaptation and acclimation capability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22539637     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tps037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  6 in total

Review 1.  Temporal Dynamics of Stomatal Behavior: Modeling and Implications for Photosynthesis and Water Use.

Authors:  Silvere R M Vialet-Chabrand; Jack S A Matthews; Lorna McAusland; Michael R Blatt; Howard Griffiths; Tracy Lawson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Biochemical and Physiological Characteristics of Photosynthesis in Plants of Two Calathea Species.

Authors:  Hoang Chinh Nguyen; Kuan-Hung Lin; Tung-Chuan Hsiung; Meng-Yuan Huang; Chi-Ming Yang; Jen-Hsien Weng; Ming-Huang Hsu; Po-Yen Chen; Kai-Chieh Chang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Rapid Light-Response Curve of Chlorophyll Fluorescence in Terrestrial Plants: Relationship to CO2 Exchange among Five Woody and Four Fern Species Adapted to Different Light and Water Regimes.

Authors:  Meng-Yuan Huang; Shau-Lian Wong; Jen-Hsien Weng
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-26

4.  Photosynthesis in Response to Different Salinities and Immersions of Two Native Rhizophoraceae Mangroves.

Authors:  Chung-I Chen; Kuan-Hung Lin; Meng-Yuan Huang; Shau-Lian Wong; Tien-Szu Liao; Ming-Nan Chen; Jen-Hsien Weng; Mei-Li Hsueh; Yu-Hsiang Lai; Ching-Wen Wang
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 7.666

Review 5.  Stomatal size, speed, and responsiveness impact on photosynthesis and water use efficiency.

Authors:  Tracy Lawson; Michael R Blatt
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Characterization of photosynthetic gas exchange in leaves under simulated adaxial and abaxial surfaces alternant irradiation.

Authors:  Zi-Shan Zhang; Yu-Ting Li; Hui-Yuan Gao; Cheng Yang; Qing-Wei Meng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.