BACKGROUND: Sickness absence (SA) is a public health risk marker for morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to develop and validate prediction models to identify employees at risk of high SA. METHODS: Two prediction models were developed using self-rated health (SRH) and prior SA as predictors. SRH was measured by the categories excellent, good, fair and poor in a convenience sample of 535 hospital employees. Prior SA was retrieved from the employer's register. The predictive performance of the models was assessed by logistic regression analysis with high (≥ 90 th percentile) vs. non-high (<90th percentile) SA days and SA episodes as outcome variables and by using bootstrapping techniques to validate the models. RESULTS: The overall performance as reflected in the Nagelkerke's pseudo R(2) was 11.7% for the model identifying employees with high SA days and 31.8% for the model identifying employees with high SA episodes. The discriminative ability, represented by the area (AUC) under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC), was 0.729 (95% CI 0.667-0.809) for the model identifying employees with high SA days and 0.831 (95% CI 0.784-0.877) for the model identifying employees with high SA episodes. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed acceptable calibration for both models. CONCLUSIONS: The prediction models identified employees at risk of high SA, but need further external validation in other settings and working populations before applying them in public and occupational health research and care.
BACKGROUND:Sickness absence (SA) is a public health risk marker for morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to develop and validate prediction models to identify employees at risk of high SA. METHODS: Two prediction models were developed using self-rated health (SRH) and prior SA as predictors. SRH was measured by the categories excellent, good, fair and poor in a convenience sample of 535 hospital employees. Prior SA was retrieved from the employer's register. The predictive performance of the models was assessed by logistic regression analysis with high (≥ 90 th percentile) vs. non-high (<90th percentile) SA days and SA episodes as outcome variables and by using bootstrapping techniques to validate the models. RESULTS: The overall performance as reflected in the Nagelkerke's pseudo R(2) was 11.7% for the model identifying employees with high SA days and 31.8% for the model identifying employees with high SA episodes. The discriminative ability, represented by the area (AUC) under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC), was 0.729 (95% CI 0.667-0.809) for the model identifying employees with high SA days and 0.831 (95% CI 0.784-0.877) for the model identifying employees with high SA episodes. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed acceptable calibration for both models. CONCLUSIONS: The prediction models identified employees at risk of high SA, but need further external validation in other settings and working populations before applying them in public and occupational health research and care.
Authors: Corné A M Roelen; Christina M Stapelfeldt; Martijn W Heymans; Willem van Rhenen; Merete Labriola; Claus V Nielsen; Ute Bültmann; Chris Jensen Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2015-06
Authors: C A M Roelen; M W Heymans; J W R Twisk; W van Rhenen; S Pallesen; B Bjorvatn; B E Moen; N Magerøy Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2014-03-25 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Anna Moseley; Megan Othus; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Frederick R Appelbaum; Harry P Erba; Roland B Walter Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2021-02-09
Authors: Kerstin G Reeuwijk; Suzan J W Robroek; Maurice A J Niessen; Roderik A Kraaijenhagen; Yvonne Vergouwe; Alex Burdorf Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Corné A M Roelen; Ute Bültmann; Johan W Groothoff; Jos W R Twisk; Martijn W Heymans Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2015-02-22 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: R B Walter; M Othus; A K Burnett; B Löwenberg; H M Kantarjian; G J Ossenkoppele; R K Hills; F Ravandi; T Pabst; A Evans; S R Pierce; M-C Vekemans; F R Appelbaum; E H Estey Journal: Leukemia Date: 2014-08-12 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Corné A M Roelen; Ute Bültmann; Willem van Rhenen; Jac J L van der Klink; Jos W R Twisk; Martijn W Heymans Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Jacob Pedersen; Thomas Alexander Gerds; Jakob Bue Bjorner; Karl Bang Christensen Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 3.295